Professional Engineering Endorsement for Non-Load Bearing Walls in Singapore – Requirements and Challenges

The decision to alter or erect walls within a property in Singapore, whether for a home renovation or a commercial fit-out, often brings property owners and contractors face-to-face with a critical question: Is a Professional Engineer’s (PE) endorsement required? This question is particularly pertinent when dealing with non-load bearing walls. While seemingly less structurally critical than their load-bearing counterparts, modifications to non-load bearing walls are subject to a stringent regulatory framework designed to ensure safety, quality, and compliance in Singapore’s densely built environment.

This comprehensive guide delves into the intricacies of Professional Engineering endorsement for non-load bearing walls in Singapore. It explores the fundamental roles of PEs, defines what constitutes a non-load bearing wall, outlines the governing regulations and authorities, clarifies when PE endorsement is mandatory versus when works might be exempt, details the step-by-step endorsement process, discusses essential design and compliance requirements, and critically examines the common challenges faced by stakeholders. Understanding these aspects is paramount for anyone embarking on building works, ensuring projects proceed smoothly, safely, and in full accordance with the law.

I. The Cornerstone of Safety: Understanding PE Endorsement and Non-Load Bearing Walls in Singapore

At the heart of Singapore’s robust construction safety standards lies the figure of the Professional Engineer and the mechanism of PE endorsement. Coupled with a clear understanding of building elements like non-load bearing walls, these concepts form the bedrock of a safe and compliant built environment.

A. Defining the Professional Engineer (PE) and the Significance of PE Endorsement in Singapore’s Built Environment

A Professional Engineer (PE) in Singapore is far more than just an engineering graduate; they are licensed professionals vested with the legal authority to sign and seal engineering documents. This authority is not granted lightly and signifies a commitment to upholding public safety and welfare in all engineering undertakings.¹ PEs are regarded as cornerstones for major infrastructure design and build projects, bringing a blend of technical acumen, creativity, and leadership to the table.¹ Their work is foundational to societal well-being, ensuring that buildings stand firm and infrastructure functions reliably.²

PE endorsement, in this context, is the formal certification by a registered PE signifying that specific construction plans, designs, or completed works comply with all relevant building codes, engineering standards, and safety regulations.³ It is a specialized attestation focusing on the technical compliance and safety of engineering designs and structures within Singapore’s regulatory framework.⁴

The paramount importance of PE endorsement stems from several critical factors:

• Public Safety: First and foremost, PEs act as guardians of public safety.¹ Their endorsement ensures that engineering projects, including modifications to non-load bearing walls, meet high safety standards. This crucial role has historical roots; the establishment of licensure laws was a direct response to engineering disasters in the early 20th century, aimed at protecting the public from unqualified individuals practicing engineering.¹
• Regulatory Compliance: PE endorsement is a key mechanism for ensuring adherence to Singapore’s stringent building codes, such as the Building Control Act and the Fire Safety Act.¹ Compliance, verified by a PE, helps avoid penalties, legal issues, and ensures the structural integrity and safety of the building.²
• Quality Assurance & Structural Integrity: PEs bring extensive technical knowledge and experience to projects, providing high-quality, innovative, and efficient solutions that ensure the long-term durability and reliability of engineering works.¹
• Career Significance for Engineers: For engineering professionals, achieving PE status is a significant career milestone. It unlocks opportunities for higher earning potential, greater job responsibilities, and the authority to independently approve and sign off on projects, reflecting their proven expertise and commitment to the profession.²

(Image: Steps to PE Registration in Singapore)

The journey to becoming a PE in Singapore is a demanding one, underscoring the level of expertise required. It involves obtaining an accredited four-year engineering degree, passing two rigorous examinations – the Fundamentals of Engineering Examination (FEE) and the Practice of Professional Engineering Examination (PPE) – accumulating at least four years of relevant practical engineering experience under the supervision of a PE, and successfully navigating a professional interview conducted by the Professional Engineers Board (PEB).¹ This rigorous process ensures that only individuals with proven competence and a strong understanding of engineering principles and local regulations are licensed to practice.

The PE’s legal authority to sign and seal documents effectively positions them as critical “gatekeepers” for safety and quality in the construction industry. Without their endorsement, many building works, especially those with potential structural or safety implications, cannot legally proceed.¹ This gatekeeping function is not merely an administrative step; it involves a substantive review process designed to filter out designs or practices that could compromise public safety or deviate from established standards. While this can sometimes be perceived as adding time or cost to a project, it is a fundamental and necessary trade-off for maintaining the high safety and quality standards characteristic of Singapore’s built environment. The system is inherently designed to prioritize safety and long-term integrity over short-term expediency when these aspects come into conflict.

B. Non-Load Bearing Walls: More Than Just Dividers – Definition, Types, and Significance

A non-load bearing wall is technically defined as a wall that supports no structural load other than its own weight.⁷ This is the primary distinction from load-bearing walls, which are integral to the building’s structural system and support loads from floors, roofs, or other structural members above them.⁸ The Building Control (Amendment No. 3) Regulations 2024 further clarifies a “partition” as “a non-load bearing wall or non-load bearing vertical panel, that is used for the subdivision of spaces within a building”.⁹

(Image: Load-Bearing vs. Non-Load Bearing Wall Diagram)

In Singapore, non-load bearing walls are commonly constructed from a variety of materials:

• Lightweight Materials: These include timber boards, plywood, fibreboards, plasterboard (drywall), aluminium sheets, corrugated metal sheets, polycarbonate sheets, hollow concrete blocks, hollow glass blocks, and autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) blocks.⁷ These materials are favored for their ease of installation and modification.
• Masonry (Potentially Heavy): Walls constructed from bricks, concrete blocks, or stone, even if designed to be non-load bearing, are considered “heavy” by the Building and Construction Authority (BCA). Property owners are advised to consult the BCA before using these materials for erecting partition walls, as their weight can have implications for the supporting structure.⁷
• Precast Panels: Precast hollow concrete wall panels are also utilized. Depending on their height and design, these may require additional elements like stiffeners and lintels to ensure stability.¹¹

(Image: Examples of Non-Load Bearing Wall Types)

While they don’t carry the building’s primary structural loads, non-load bearing walls serve several significant functions:

• Space Division and Functionality: Their most obvious role is to subdivide larger spaces into rooms, corridors, and other functional areas, defining the layout and use of a building’s interior.⁷
• Aesthetics and Design Flexibility: They offer considerable flexibility in interior design, allowing for various configurations and finishes to achieve desired aesthetic outcomes.
• Service Integration: Non-load bearing walls, particularly stud partitions, commonly conceal essential building services such as electrical wiring, data cables, plumbing pipes, and air-conditioning ductwork.
• Fire Compartmentation: A critical, and often underestimated, function is their role in fire safety. Properly designed and constructed non-load bearing walls can act as fire barriers, forming compartment walls that help to contain the spread of fire and smoke, thereby protecting escape routes and limiting property damage.¹⁴
• Acoustic Performance: They contribute significantly to sound insulation between adjacent spaces, enhancing privacy and occupant comfort in residential, commercial, and institutional buildings.¹⁶

The term “non-load bearing” can sometimes be a misnomer, leading to an underestimation of their importance and the regulations surrounding their modification. While they don’t support vertical loads from the building structure, these walls have critical functions related to fire safety, acoustic separation, service integration, and their own inherent stability. For instance, party walls between condominium units or terraced houses, though often non-load bearing in terms of the building’s primary structure, have crucial roles in fire separation and acoustic insulation between dwellings.¹⁹ Similarly, non-load bearing walls exceeding a certain height (typically 3.3 meters in Singapore) require specific design by a PE to ensure their stability against lateral forces like wind pressure or accidental impact.¹¹ The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) Fire Code also imposes stringent requirements on the materials and fire-resistance ratings of internal non-load-bearing walls, particularly in residential units and for walls forming fire compartments.¹⁵ This inherent complexity, even in walls not carrying primary building loads, justifies the regulatory scrutiny and, in many cases, the necessity for PE endorsement. The need for such endorsement isn’t solely about whether the wall “carries weight” from above, but also about its own stability, its interaction with the building’s overall safety systems, and its compliance with specific performance standards like SS 492 for robustness.¹²

C. Why This Matters: Safety, Compliance, and Peace of Mind for All Stakeholders

The rigorous process of PE endorsement for building works, including those involving non-load bearing walls, serves the interests of all parties involved:

• For Property Owners: It provides assurance regarding the safety of occupants and the structural integrity of their property. Compliance with regulations, verified by a PE, protects property value, helps avoid potential legal liabilities and penalties for unauthorized or unsafe works, and facilitates smoother future transactions, such as the sale of the property.
• For Contractors: Engaging a PE and adhering to endorsed plans demonstrates professionalism and a commitment to quality and safety. It helps mitigate their liability by ensuring works are carried out to approved standards and fulfills legal and contractual obligations, thereby building trust with clients.
• For the Public: Ultimately, the system of PE endorsement contributes to a safer and more reliable built environment for everyone in Singapore. It upholds the high standards expected in a developed nation, ensuring that buildings are designed and constructed to withstand anticipated loads and hazards, including fire.

PE endorsement acts as a formal risk mitigation mechanism. The process involves thorough checks by a qualified and licensed professional for structural adequacy, fire safety, and overall compliance with a multitude of regulations.¹ By engaging a PE, the responsibility for the technical adequacy and safety of the design is transferred to this expert. This is particularly crucial in a densely populated urban environment like Singapore, where the failure of even a seemingly minor building element can have significant consequences. Therefore, the time and financial investment associated with obtaining PE endorsement should be viewed not as a mere expense or administrative hurdle, but as a prudent investment in risk reduction. This investment helps prevent potentially far greater costs that could arise from structural failures, accidents, legal disputes, regulatory enforcement actions, or the need for costly rectification work down the line. This perspective is vital for stakeholders weighing the perceived “hassle” against the long-term benefits of safety and compliance.

II. Identifying Non-Load Bearing Walls: A Critical First Step

Before any modification or demolition work begins, accurately distinguishing between load-bearing and non-load bearing walls is paramount. This initial step dictates the regulatory pathway, the need for PE involvement, and the potential impact on the building’s structural integrity.

A. The Technical Distinction: Load-Bearing vs. Non-Load Bearing in Detail

Load-bearing walls are integral components of a building’s structural frame. Their primary function is to support and transmit vertical loads from floors, roofs, beams, or other structural elements above them, down through the structure to the foundations.⁸ These loads can include dead loads (the weight of the structure itself and permanent fixtures) and live loads (occupants, furniture, snow, etc.). Altering, removing, or creating significant openings in load-bearing walls without meticulous engineering design, PE endorsement, and authority approval can severely compromise the building’s stability, leading to potential collapse, excessive deflection, or cracking, and endangering occupants.⁸

Non-load bearing walls, as previously defined, primarily support only their own weight and do not carry or transmit any significant loads from other parts of the building’s structure.⁷ Their removal or alteration is generally less critical to the overall building stability than that of load-bearing walls. However, this does not mean they are without structural considerations or other important functions. They must still be stable under their own weight and resist lateral forces such as wind (if external or exposed), accidental impacts, or crowd pressure. Furthermore, their role in fire compartmentation, acoustic separation, and housing building services means that modifications must still be carefully planned and executed.

Key differentiators between the two types include:

• Primary Function: Structural support for the building (load-bearing) versus space division, enclosure, or specific functional performance like fire resistance or acoustic insulation (non-load bearing).
• Connection to Structure: Load-bearing walls are typically directly connected to and support primary structural elements like beams and slabs. Non-load bearing walls are often framed between or abut structural elements but do not carry their loads.
• Materials (General Tendency): Load-bearing walls are usually constructed from robust materials like reinforced concrete, structural steel, or heavy masonry designed for strength. While non-load bearing walls can also be made of concrete or masonry, they are more frequently constructed from lightweight materials like drywall on timber or steel studs, or lightweight blocks.⁷ However, material alone is not a definitive indicator.

Relying solely on visual inspection or assumptions based on material types to differentiate between load-bearing and non-load bearing walls can be highly unreliable and risky. For instance, a concrete or block wall might appear substantial, leading one to assume it’s load-bearing, but it could be a non-load bearing party wall with specific fire and acoustic design requirements. Conversely, a seemingly simple partition wall, especially in older HDB flats, might conceal structural stiffeners or lintels that contribute to local stability and should not be removed without proper assessment.⁸ This potential for misidentification strongly underscores the necessity of consulting original building plans or engaging a PE for accurate assessment, particularly when plans are unavailable, outdated, or unclear. Attempting to self-assess without the requisite expertise can lead to dangerous and financially burdensome errors.

B. Common Types and Materials of Non-Load Bearing Walls in Singapore (Elaborated)

Understanding the common types and materials used for non-load bearing walls in Singapore provides practical context for identification and appreciating their varied characteristics.

• Drywall/Plasterboard Partitions: These are perhaps the most common type of internal non-load bearing wall, especially in commercial and modern residential buildings. They typically consist of a lightweight frame made from cold-formed steel studs or timber studs, covered on one or both sides with gypsum plasterboards.7 The cavity between the boards can be filled with insulation for improved acoustic or thermal performance. They are relatively easy and quick to install, modify, or remove.
  (Image: Steel Stud Drywall Assembly Cross-Section)
• Lightweight Concrete Block Walls: These walls are constructed using blocks made from autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC), cellular lightweight concrete, or similar lightweight aggregate concrete products.7 AAC blocks, for example, offer good thermal and acoustic insulation properties and are relatively lightweight compared to traditional concrete blocks, while still providing a solid feel.
  (Image: AAC Block Wall Construction)
• Glass Partitions: Increasingly popular for creating bright, open-plan spaces in offices and contemporary homes, glass partitions can be framed or frameless. Design considerations include the type of glass (e.g., tempered, laminated for safety), thickness, and the structural adequacy of the framing and fixings, especially for full-height installations.
• Precast Concrete Panels (Non-Load Bearing Application): As mentioned earlier, precast concrete panels can be designed for non-load bearing applications, such as internal partitions or external cladding. These are manufactured off-site and then transported for erection, offering speed and quality control. High precast non-load bearing walls may require integrated stiffeners or additional bracing.¹¹
• Brick/Masonry Partitions (Non-Load Bearing): While traditional brick or solid concrete block walls are often load-bearing, they can also be designed as non-load bearing partitions. However, due to their significant weight, the BCA advises consultation before using such materials for partitions, as they can impose substantial dead loads on the supporting floor slabs, potentially requiring structural checks and PE endorsement.⁷

The choice of material for a non-load bearing wall is not arbitrary and extends beyond just its weight or ease of installation. Different materials possess varying inherent properties concerning fire resistance, acoustic performance, robustness against impact, and durability. For example, the SCDF Fire Code mandates the use of non-combustible materials for internal non-load-bearing walls within residential units and specifies minimum fire-resistance ratings for walls that form part of a fire compartment.¹⁴ Singapore Standard SS 492 grades partition systems based on their ability to withstand various physical tests, such as stiffness and impact resistance, performance which is heavily influenced by the wall’s material and construction.¹² Therefore, when modifying existing non-load bearing walls or erecting new ones, the selected materials and construction methods must ensure compliance with all applicable codes, encompassing fire safety, acoustic performance, and structural robustness, not merely the absence of vertical load-bearing function. This often necessitates the input of a PE to ensure that the chosen solution is fit for purpose and meets all regulatory requirements.

C. Practical Ways to Identify Wall Types: From Blueprints to Professional Assessment

Several methods can be employed to determine whether a wall is load-bearing or non-load bearing, ranging from reviewing official documents to seeking expert advice.

1. Reviewing Building Blueprints/Structural Plans: This is the most reliable and definitive method. Architectural and structural plans, especially the “as-built” drawings, explicitly indicate which walls are designed as load-bearing structural elements and which are non-load bearing partitions. For condominiums and commercial properties, these plans can often be obtained from the building management or the Management Corporation Strata Title (MCST). For HDB flats, floor plans can be purchased from HDB, which may provide some indication, though detailed structural plans might require further inquiry or PE assessment.²¹
2. Engaging a Licensed Builder or Qualified Professional Engineer (PE): This is essential when building plans are unavailable, unclear, outdated, or if there is any doubt whatsoever about a wall’s function.⁸ A PE can conduct a thorough site assessment, review any available documentation, and, if necessary, perform non-intrusive investigations (e.g., using specialized scanning equipment or making small exploratory openings with owner’s consent) to determine the wall’s construction and structural role. Their expertise is invaluable in making an accurate determination.
3. Consulting HDB/MCST Guidelines: For HDB flats, the Housing & Development Board provides specific renovation guidelines that often delineate which walls are permissible to be hacked or altered.⁸ Similarly, the MCST of a condominium will have its own set of renovation rules and by-laws, which typically require PE reports and endorsement for any wall alterations, particularly if there’s any structural implication.⁸ These guidelines are crucial first points of reference for property owners.
4. Observing Wall Thickness and Material (with extreme caution): As a very general rule of thumb, exceptionally thick walls made of reinforced concrete or solid masonry are more likely to be load-bearing. However, this is not a definitive method and should be approached with extreme caution, as highlighted by the fallibility of visual inspection alone. Many non-load bearing party walls, for instance, can be quite thick for fire and acoustic reasons.
5. Checking for Beams and Columns (with caution): Walls located directly beneath large structural beams or in alignment with a row of columns are often, but not always, load-bearing, as they may be part of the system transferring loads from these elements. Conversely, walls that run parallel to floor joists or are clearly independent of the primary structural frame are more likely to be non-load bearing. Again, this is an observational clue, not a substitute for professional verification.

The consistent advice from regulatory bodies and industry experts is to confirm the wall type before commencing any hacking or alteration work.⁸ Incorrectly identifying a load-bearing wall as non-load bearing and proceeding with unapproved or improperly designed modifications can have catastrophic consequences. These include severe structural damage to the building, immediate safety hazards to occupants, stop-work orders from authorities, hefty fines, and legal mandates to reinstate the wall to its original condition, often at a far greater expense than the proposed alteration itself.⁸ The initial effort and potential cost associated with accurate wall identification, such as engaging a PE for an assessment or obtaining official plans, are minor when compared to the potential financial, legal, and safety repercussions of an error. This underscores a fundamental principle in construction and renovation: proactive verification and due diligence save significant trouble and expense in the long run.

III. Navigating Singapore’s Regulatory Landscape for Building Works

The modification or erection of non-load bearing walls in Singapore is governed by a comprehensive regulatory framework involving several key authorities. Understanding their roles and the principal legislation is crucial for compliance.

A. The Building and Construction Authority (BCA): Guardian of Building Safety

The Building and Construction Authority (BCA) is a statutory board operating under the aegis of Singapore’s Ministry of National Development.²² Its core mission is to shape and regulate Singapore’s built environment, ensuring it is safe, of high quality, sustainable, and user-friendly.²³ BCA is responsible for developing the capabilities of the construction industry and enforcing building standards.²²

(Image: Building and Construction Authority (BCA) Logo)

The cornerstone of BCA’s regulatory power is the Building Control Act (Chapter 29).²⁵ This Act and its subsidiary legislation provide the legal framework for controlling building works in Singapore. Its primary objective is to ensure that all such works comply with established standards for structural safety, accessibility for persons with disabilities, environmental sustainability, and buildability (the ease of construction).²⁵

A central function of the BCA, through the office of the Commissioner of Building Control, is the plan approval process. The Building Control Act mandates that plans for all building works – which broadly include the erection, extension, or demolition of a building; any alteration, addition, or repair of a building; and the provision or alteration of air-conditioning systems – must be submitted to and approved by the BCA before commencement, unless such works are specifically exempted.²⁵

The Building Control Regulations provide the detailed rules and requirements supporting the Act. Of particular relevance to non-load bearing walls is the First Schedule of these Regulations, which lists “insignificant building works.” These are minor works that are exempt from the full plan submission and approval process, though they must still comply with underlying safety and performance requirements.⁷

To provide technical guidance on meeting the performance requirements stipulated in the Building Control Regulations, BCA publishes the Approved Document. This document offers acceptable solutions and references relevant Singapore Standards (SS) and Eurocodes, serving as a key technical resource for QPs and PEs in designing compliant building works.²⁵

BCA’s role is multifaceted. While it is a regulator that sets and enforces rules for building safety and quality ²², it also acts as an enabler for the industry. It champions development, promotes best practices, and provides clarity through documents like the Approved Document, various circulars, and advisories.¹¹ This dual function aims to strike a pragmatic balance between maintaining Singapore’s high safety standards and facilitating practical and efficient construction processes. Professionals and the public alike should therefore view BCA not merely as an enforcement agency but also as a valuable source of guidance and information. Proactively understanding and utilizing BCA’s published materials can significantly aid in addressing compliance issues from the outset of any building project.

B. The Professional Engineers Board (PEB) Singapore: Upholding Engineering Standards

The Professional Engineers Board (PEB) Singapore is another statutory board under the Ministry of National Development, established by the Professional Engineers Act.⁵ Its fundamental mission is to safeguard the life, property, and welfare of the public by setting and maintaining high standards for professional engineering practice in Singapore.⁵

(Image: Professional Engineers Board (PEB) Singapore Logo)

The PEB’s key functions, as prescribed in the Professional Engineers Act, include:

• Keeping and maintaining registers of professional engineers, specialist professional engineers, practitioners, and licensed corporations that supply professional engineering services.⁵
• Processing applications for registration, which involves assessing qualifications, conducting examinations (FEE and PPE), and evaluating practical experience to ensure candidates are competent to practice.⁵
• Issuing practising certificates to registered PEs, which must be renewed annually and are contingent upon fulfilling Continuing Professional Development (CPD) requirements.⁵
• Licensing corporations and partnerships that wish to supply professional engineering services in Singapore.⁵
• Promoting learning and education in connection with engineering and fostering the development of the profession.⁵

A critical instrument wielded by the PEB is the Professional Engineers (Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics) Rules. All registered PEs and licensed engineering entities are mandated to comply with this code.⁵ This code establishes high standards of professional conduct and ethical behavior, ensuring that PEs discharge their duties with integrity, competence, and with paramount regard for public safety and welfare.

While the BCA regulates the “what” – the building works themselves and their compliance with technical codes – the PEB regulates the “who” – the Professional Engineers who design, supervise, and endorse these works. This focus on the individual PE’s competency, ethical conduct, and ongoing professional development forms the “soft infrastructure” that underpins the safety and reliability of Singapore’s built environment. A PE’s endorsement is only as trustworthy as their knowledge, experience, diligence, and integrity. The requirements for rigorous examinations, substantial practical experience, and mandatory CPD ensure that PEs maintain and enhance their capabilities throughout their careers, keeping abreast of evolving standards, technologies, and best practices. The PEB’s diligent oversight in maintaining these high professional standards is fundamental to the credibility of the entire PE endorsement system. It ensures that a PE’s stamp is not just a rubber stamp, but a mark of genuine professional competence and ethical commitment.

C. The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF): Guardians of Fire Safety

The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) plays an indispensable role in building safety, specifically concerning fire safety. SCDF enforces the Fire Safety Act 1993 and its subsidiary regulations, which aim to protect lives and property from fire hazards.³ For many building works, particularly those involving structural changes, layout modifications, or alterations to fire safety systems, approval from SCDF and often a Fire Certificate (FC) are required in addition to BCA’s approvals.³

(Image: Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) Logo)

SCDF publishes the Fire Code (Code of Practice for Fire Precautions in Buildings), which is a comprehensive technical document detailing the mandatory fire safety requirements for buildings in Singapore. The Fire Code covers a wide range of aspects, including means of escape, structural fire precautions (such as the fire resistance of building elements, including non-load bearing walls used for compartmentation), fire detection and alarm systems, firefighting access, and smoke control systems.¹⁴

Professional Engineers, and in more complex cases, specialist Fire Safety Engineers (FSEs), are deeply involved in the fire safety aspects of building design and modification. They prepare and endorse plans for submission to SCDF’s Fire Safety and Shelter Department (FSSD), ensuring that the proposed works comply with the Fire Code.³ For instance, in HDB flats, the enclosure of balconies with windows or awnings requires a PE to submit building plans to SCDF for approval due to implications for fire safety and ventilation.²¹

The domains of structural safety (primarily BCA’s purview) and fire safety (SCDF’s purview) are inextricably linked. A wall that is structurally sound but fails prematurely in a fire, compromising compartmentation or escape routes, can be just as catastrophic as a wall that collapses under its applied loads. Consequently, PEs endorsing non-load bearing walls must meticulously consider their fire performance characteristics. This includes assessing the combustibility of materials, ensuring adequate fire-resistance ratings (covering integrity, insulation, and stability where applicable) as stipulated in the Fire Code ¹⁴, and considering the impact of any penetrations for services. This is why SCDF plan submissions and the issuance of Fire Certificates are often integral parts of the overall building approval process. Projects involving non-load bearing walls, especially those designated as fire compartment walls or those affecting means of escape, will invariably undergo scrutiny from both BCA and SCDF, adding a layer of complexity that necessitates careful coordination between different sets of regulatory requirements and potentially different Qualified Persons (e.g., a PE (Civil/Structural) for structural aspects and an FSE or PE (Mechanical/Electrical) for fire safety systems).

D. Interplay with Other Authorities (URA, HDB, JTC)

Beyond BCA, PEB, and SCDF, other authorities may have jurisdiction over building works involving non-load bearing walls, depending on the property type and the nature of the work.

• Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA): As Singapore’s national land use planning and conservation authority, URA’s approval is often a crucial first step. Written Permission (WP) or planning permission from URA is typically required before building plans can be formally submitted to BCA.³⁷ URA’s Development Control Guidelines also include requirements related to the subdivision of spaces within buildings, which can be directly impacted by the erection or removal of partition walls.⁷ For example, changes to internal layouts might affect GFA (Gross Floor Area) calculations or compliance with unit size and occupancy guidelines.
• Housing & Development Board (HDB): For the vast majority of Singapore’s population residing in HDB flats, HDB has its own specific renovation guidelines and permit requirements. Any hacking of walls, even non-load bearing ones, in an HDB flat requires a permit from HDB.⁸ HDB may also mandate PE endorsement for certain types of work, such as the demolition of non-load bearing reinforced concrete (RC) elements like stiffeners or lintels, or for the enclosure of balconies which has fire safety implications requiring SCDF clearance first.⁸
• JTC Corporation: For industrial properties developed and managed by JTC, specific submission procedures and PE endorsement requirements are outlined in JTC’s Space Submission Handbooks. For instance, the construction or removal of internal non-load bearing concrete and masonry walls in JTC premises typically requires PE (Civil) endorsed drawings and calculations to verify structural integrity.³⁹

The involvement of multiple agencies means that obtaining all necessary approvals can be a complex and time-consuming process. A seemingly straightforward modification to a non-load bearing wall might trigger requirements from URA for planning aspects, BCA for building safety, SCDF for fire safety, and HDB or JTC for property-specific compliance. Each authority has its own set of regulations, submission protocols, and review timelines. For example, URA’s Written Permission is a prerequisite for BCA’s building plan processing.³⁷ SCDF’s fire safety approval might run concurrently or be needed before a final green light from BCA or HDB.³ This multi-agency landscape presents a significant challenge, often perceived as a “no one-stop shop” by applicants. It necessitates meticulous planning, a thorough understanding of each agency’s purview and requirements, and effective coordination, usually orchestrated by the appointed QP or PE. Property owners and contractors need to be aware that “BCA approval” is often just one piece of a larger regulatory puzzle, and navigating this multi-layered jurisdiction is a common hurdle in the PE endorsement and overall project approval process.

IV. PE Endorsement for Non-Load Bearing Walls: When Is It Compulsory?

A common query among property owners and contractors is whether PE endorsement is always necessary for works involving non-load bearing walls. The answer is nuanced, hinging on the specific nature of the works, prevailing regulations, and the potential impact on building safety and performance.

A. The General Principle: Ensuring Structural Integrity, Safety, and Regulatory Adherence

Even if a wall is classified as non-load bearing, modifications to it are not without potential consequences. Such alterations can impact:

• Its own stability: This is particularly true for high walls (e.g., those exceeding 3.3 meters), walls constructed from heavy materials (like brick or concrete blocks), or walls that might be subjected to significant lateral loads from wind, crowd pressure, or accidental impacts.
• Fire safety: If the non-load bearing wall serves as a fire compartment barrier, or if its alteration affects escape routes, fire door integrity, or the layout and performance of fire safety systems (like sprinklers or detectors), its fire performance characteristics are critical.
• Overall building performance: Changes can affect acoustic separation between spaces, the integrity of services housed within the wall, or even the aesthetic and functional aspects of the building.

PE endorsement becomes necessary when these modifications pose potential risks to any of these aspects, or when explicitly mandated by regulations for specific scenarios and building types. The Building Control Act operates on a precautionary principle, requiring plan approval for virtually all building works unless they are specifically listed as exempt.²⁵ This means that even for non-load bearing walls, the onus is on the property owner and their Qualified Person (QP) to demonstrate either that the work is genuinely “insignificant” according to the regulations, or, if it is not, that it has been properly designed, assessed, and endorsed by a competent PE to ensure safety and compliance. Therefore, the assumption that “non-load bearing” automatically equates to “no PE needed” is a misconception. Exemptions exist, but they are clearly defined and come with specific conditions that must be rigorously met.

B. “Insignificant Building Works”: Understanding BCA Exemptions for Non-Load Bearing Walls

The Building Control Regulations, specifically in its First Schedule, lists building works that are deemed “insignificant.” These works generally do not require formal plan submission to and approval from the BCA, although they must still comply with underlying safety standards and any other applicable laws.⁷

Prior to recent amendments, key exemptions related to non-load bearing walls included ⁷:

• The demolition, restoration, or reinstatement of any non-load bearing wall. A crucial condition for restoration or reinstatement was that the material used must not be heavier than that of the existing wall material.
• The creation of any opening in a non-load bearing wall or the sealing up of any existing wall opening. Similarly, when sealing an opening, the material used must not be heavier than the material of the existing wall. Owners were also reminded to ensure the wall was genuinely non-load bearing.
• The erection or alteration of partitions, with specific conditions:
  • In any bungalow, semi-detached, terrace, or linked house.
  • In any other building, provided the partition was constructed of lightweight material. “Lightweight material” was defined to include sheet/board materials (timber, plasterboard, etc.) and lightweight blocks (hollow concrete/glass, AAC). Masonry walls of brick, concrete, or stone were explicitly stated as heavy, requiring BCA consultation.

Crucial Update: Building Control (Amendment No. 3) Regulations 2024

Effective from 1 April 2025, the Building Control (Amendment No. 3) Regulations 2024 have significantly expanded and refined the list of insignificant building works.9 These changes provide greater clarity and, in some cases, broader exemptions. For non-load bearing walls and partitions, key updates include:

• Non-load bearing boundary walls, fences, or gates are now explicitly listed as insignificant.
• Partitions (newly defined in the schedule as “a non-load bearing wall or non-load bearing vertical panel, that is used for the subdivision of spaces within a building”): The erection or alteration of such partitions is considered insignificant if they are up to a height not exceeding 10 metres, provided that:
  • If in any bungalow, semi-detached, terrace, or linked house: any non-laminated glass used in the partition is not situated more than 2.4 metres in height.
  • If in any other building: the partition is constructed of lightweight material.
• Demolition of non-load bearing walls: While previously covered, the new amendments provide a clearer framework under Item 16 (new) of the First Schedule, which includes the definitions of “non-load bearing wall” and “partition” for the purpose of these exemptions.⁹
• Formation of openings in slabs (excluding cantilever, flat, and prestressed slabs): The creation of small openings (e.g., circular openings not exceeding 150mm in diameter, or rectangular/square openings where no side exceeds 150mm) for building services is now considered insignificant, provided it doesn’t involve altering other structural elements and meets specific spacing criteria if other openings exist.⁹

The table below summarizes some key exempted works related to non-load bearing walls and partitions based on the latest amendments:

Table 1: BCA’s List of Key Exempted Works for Non-Load Bearing Walls & Partitions (Post-April 2025 Amendments)

 

Type of Work	Key Conditions for Exemption (Illustrative, refer to full Regulations)	BCA Regulation Reference (Building Control Regulations, First Schedule, as amended 2024)
Demolition, restoration, or reinstatement of any non-load bearing wall/vertical panel.	Material weight for reinstatement not heavier than existing. Wall must be truly non-load bearing.	Item 16(o) (incorporating definitions from 16) 7
Creation of any opening in a non-load bearing wall/vertical panel or sealing up of any wall opening.	Wall must be truly non-load bearing. Material for sealing not heavier than existing wall.	Item 16(n) (incorporating definitions from 16) 7
Erection or alteration of any partition (non-load bearing wall/panel for subdivision).	Height not exceeding 10m. If in bungalow, semi-D, terrace, linked house: non-laminated glass not >2.4m high. If in other buildings: constructed of lightweight material.	Item 6 9
Non-load bearing boundary wall, boundary fence, or gate.	Must be non-load bearing.	Item (c) 9

Note: This table is illustrative. Always refer to the latest official Building Control Regulations and consult with BCA or a QP if in doubt.

It is critical to understand that these exemptions are conditional, not absolute. Simply because a project involves a “non-load bearing wall” does not grant an automatic pass from regulatory oversight. The specific conditions attached to each exemption – such as material weight restrictions, ensuring the wall is genuinely non-load bearing, height limitations for partitions, or the use of lightweight materials – must be strictly adhered to.⁷ For example, under the amended regulations, erecting a partition in an apartment (classified as “any other building”) using heavy bricks, even if it’s non-load bearing and below 10 meters, would likely not qualify as an insignificant building work because it doesn’t use “lightweight material”.⁹ Misinterpreting or failing to meet these conditions can result in the work being deemed unauthorized, leading to potential enforcement action by BCA. This underscores the importance of carefully reviewing the detailed provisions of the First Schedule or seeking professional advice from a QP/PE, even when an exemption is anticipated. The “devil truly is in the details” of these regulatory exemptions.

C. Scenarios Typically Demanding PE Endorsement for Non-Load Bearing Walls

Despite the exemptions for insignificant works, numerous scenarios involving non-load bearing walls will necessitate PE endorsement. These typically arise when the proposed works have potential implications for structural stability (either of the wall itself or the supporting structure), fire safety, or when mandated by specific authorities or building management.

• High Non-Load Bearing Walls: As per a BCA advisory, non-load bearing walls that exceed 3.3 meters in height are considered “high.” These walls require design and supervision by a PE (Civil) to ensure their stability against lateral loads (such as wind pressure in exposed locations or accidental impact) and to prevent issues like excessive deflection or cracking.¹¹ The PE’s design will address aspects like stiffening, bracing, and proper connections to the main structure.
• Walls Made of Heavy Materials: If non-load bearing walls or partitions are to be constructed using heavy materials like solid concrete blocks, bricks, or stone, PE assessment and endorsement are often required.⁷ This is because the substantial self-weight of such walls can impose significant loads on the supporting floor slabs or beams. A PE needs to verify that the existing structure can safely carry these additional loads without adverse effects like excessive deflection or structural overstress. JTC, for instance, explicitly requires PE (Civil) endorsed drawings and calculations for the construction or removal of internal non-load bearing concrete and masonry walls in their properties.³⁹
• Impact on Fire Safety: This is a critical area. If a non-load bearing wall forms part of a designated fire compartment (e.g., separating different occupancies, protecting escape routes, or enclosing fire-rated shafts), any alteration to it must be endorsed by a PE or a Fire Safety Engineer (FSE). The endorsement ensures that the wall’s fire integrity, insulation, and stability (where required) are maintained or appropriately reinstated in compliance with the SCDF Fire Code.³ This includes ensuring correct materials, construction details, and protection of any openings or service penetrations.
• Specific HDB Requirements: The Housing & Development Board has particular rules for renovations in its flats:
  • Demolition of non-load bearing RC elements: If homeowners wish to demolish non-load bearing reinforced concrete elements like stiffeners (often found in older flats), lintels over doorways, or hangers, HDB mandates the engagement of a PE to supervise the demolition. This is to ensure that no actual load-bearing structural elements (columns, beams, slabs, or structural walls) are inadvertently damaged during the process.⁸
  • Enclosure of interaction balconies: For fire safety reasons (related to ventilation and smoke control), the enclosure of HDB interaction balconies with windows or awnings requires the flat owner to engage a PE (Civil or Structural) to prepare and submit building plans to SCDF for approval. HDB will only issue its renovation permit after SCDF approval is obtained.²¹
• Specific JTC Requirements: As mentioned, JTC Corporation requires PE (Civil) endorsement for drawings and calculations related to the structural integrity check for the construction or removal of internal non-load bearing concrete and masonry walls within its industrial properties.³⁹
• Condominium MCST Requirements: Many Management Corporation Strata Titles (MCSTs) for private condominiums have their own renovation by-laws that are often stricter than general BCA exemptions. They frequently mandate PE endorsement for any wall hacking or significant alteration, regardless of whether the wall is load-bearing or non-load bearing. This is to safeguard the collective interest of all subsidiary proprietors by ensuring the overall structural integrity and safety of the building.⁸ The PE’s report and endorsed plans typically need to be submitted to the MCST for approval before works can commence.
• When “Immaterial Changes” Become “Material”: According to a BCA circular (BCA BC 15.0.3, dated 13 March 2014), if alterations to non-load bearing walls (such as changes to their area or positions) exceed 20% of the total area of non-load bearing walls on an affected floor, these changes may no longer be considered “immaterial.” Instead, they could be classified as “material changes” that would necessitate the submission of amendment plans to BCA for approval, which in turn would require PE endorsement.³⁰
• Installations Affecting Wall Stability or Integrity: If significant openings are to be created in existing non-load bearing walls, or if heavy fixtures, equipment, or machinery are to be mounted on them, a PE’s assessment might be needed. This is to ensure that the wall itself remains stable, that the loads from such installations can be safely supported by the wall and its connections, and that the overall integrity of the wall (e.g., its fire rating or acoustic performance) is not compromised.

The need for PE endorsement for non-load bearing walls is highly context-dependent. It is influenced significantly by the type of property (HDB, private condominium, landed property, or JTC industrial space) and the specific scope and nature of the proposed works. General BCA exemptions provide a baseline, but specific authorities like HDB and JTC, or governing bodies like MCSTs, often impose additional, more stringent requirements. Furthermore, the scale of the alteration (e.g., a minor opening versus removing a substantial length of wall) and the materials involved (lightweight versus heavy masonry) are critical factors. There is no universal “yes” or “no” answer that applies to all situations. Stakeholders must first identify the type of property and all relevant authorities having jurisdiction, in addition to BCA and SCDF. Assuming that a general rule or exemption applies universally across all property types and work scopes is a common pitfall and a significant challenge in navigating the regulatory landscape.

V. The PE Endorsement Blueprint: A Step-by-Step Process Guide

Obtaining a PE endorsement for non-load bearing wall modifications involves a structured process, from initial engagement with a Professional Engineer to securing final approvals from the relevant authorities. Understanding these steps can help property owners and contractors navigate the requirements more effectively.

(Video: The PE Endorsement Process for Non-Load Bearing Walls in Singapore – A Step-by-Step Guide)

A. Engaging Your Professional Engineer: Selection and Initial Consultation

The first crucial step is to engage a Qualified Person (QP), who for structural matters related to walls, will typically be a Professional Engineer registered with the Professional Engineers Board (PEB) Singapore and holding a valid practising certificate in the Civil or Structural engineering discipline.¹ The PEB website maintains a directory of registered PEs, which can be a useful resource for finding a suitable professional.⁴³

Once a PE is identified, an initial consultation is arranged.³ This meeting serves several important purposes:

• Discussion of Project Scope: The property owner or contractor outlines the proposed works, including the location and type of non-load bearing walls to be altered, the objectives of the modification, and any specific requirements or constraints.
• PE’s Overview: The PE provides an overview of the PE endorsement process, explains the potential regulatory pathways (e.g., whether BCA/SCDF submissions are likely needed), and outlines the types of documentation that will be required.
• Preliminary Assessment: Based on the information provided and potentially a review of existing building plans or a preliminary site visit, the PE will make an initial assessment of whether PE endorsement is indeed necessary. This includes verifying if the wall in question is truly non-load bearing and if the proposed works fall outside the scope of “insignificant building works.”
• Clarification of Fees and Timeline: The PE will typically provide an estimate of their professional fees for the required services (design, calculations, endorsement, submissions) and an indicative timeline for the process.

This initial consultation is far more than a mere formality; it is a critical diagnostic step. It allows the PE to gain a clear understanding of the project’s intricacies and for the client to comprehend the regulatory landscape and the PE’s role. It is at this stage that potential red flags or complexities can be identified early. For instance, a client might firmly believe a wall is non-load bearing, but the PE, upon reviewing preliminary information or plans, might identify characteristics suggesting it could have some structural function or be a critical fire-rated element, thereby triggering the need for a more detailed investigation or a different compliance approach. Similarly, the PE might recognize that a seemingly minor alteration could impact fire compartmentation, thus necessitating SCDF submissions that the client had not anticipated. Investing adequate time and effort in a thorough initial consultation can save significant time, reduce costs, and prevent considerable frustration later in the project. It helps to set realistic expectations for all parties involved and ensures that the project commences on a sound regulatory and technical footing.

B. The Design and Documentation Phase: Plans, Calculations, and Method Statements

Following the initial consultation, if PE endorsement is deemed necessary, the project moves into the design and documentation phase. This is where the PE undertakes the detailed technical work required for the endorsement.

• Preparation of Detailed Plans:
  • Architectural Drawings: These show the existing layout and the proposed changes, clearly indicating the non-load bearing walls to be modified, removed, or erected. Dimensions, room usage, and overall spatial relationships are detailed.³
  • Structural Plans: If the PE determines that the non-load bearing wall modifications have structural implications (e.g., for high walls, walls made of heavy materials, walls requiring special connections, or if the alteration affects the stability of adjacent elements), detailed structural plans will be prepared. These plans will specify the wall’s construction details, materials to be used, connections to the existing structure (floor, ceiling, adjacent walls), and details of any new supporting elements like lintels, stiffeners, or bracing.¹¹
  • Mechanical & Electrical (M&E) Plans: If the non-load bearing walls house services like electrical wiring, plumbing, or air-conditioning ducts that will be affected by the modifications, relevant M&E plans showing diversions or new routings may be required.⁴⁴ These are often prepared by an M&E PE.
• Design Calculations:
  The PE will perform necessary engineering calculations to verify the adequacy and safety of the proposed works.37 For non-load bearing walls, these calculations might include:
  • Stability analysis, especially for high walls or walls subjected to lateral loads (e.g., wind, crowd pressure, impact).
  • Verification of the adequacy of materials selected.
  • Checks on the capacity of existing supporting structures (e.g., floor slab) if a new, heavy non-load bearing wall is being added.
  • Design of connections and any required bracing elements. These calculations must be performed in accordance with relevant Singapore Standards (SS), Eurocodes and their Singapore National Annexes (e.g., SS EN 1991 series for actions/loads, SS EN 1992 series for concrete structures, SS EN 1996 series for masonry structures).
• Method Statement:
  For more complex installations, such as high non-load bearing walls or those involving specialized materials or construction techniques, a detailed method statement may be required.11 This document outlines the proposed sequence of work, safety procedures to be implemented during construction, and quality control measures to ensure compliance with the design. The design PE is often required to review and endorse this method statement.
• Collation and Refinement of Documents:
  All architectural, structural, and M&E plans, along with design calculations, material specifications, and method statements, are collated. The PE will ensure these documents are refined to accurately reflect the design intent and comply with all relevant local building codes, fire safety regulations, and other applicable standards.3

(Image: Example of PE Drawing Detail and Calculation Sheet)

The documentation prepared during this phase is not merely administrative paperwork; it constitutes the PE’s auditable proof of professional due diligence. These detailed plans and calculations represent the PE’s engineering analysis, design decisions, and professional judgment. They form a critical record demonstrating that the PE has exercised the necessary care and skill to ensure the proposed works are safe, compliant, and fit for purpose, as mandated by the PEB Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics.³⁴ In the event of any future issues, incidents, or regulatory investigations related to the works, these documents will be meticulously scrutinized. The thoroughness, accuracy, and completeness of this documentation are therefore of paramount importance. While this meticulous approach contributes to the time and cost associated with PE services, it is an indispensable component of professional accountability and the safeguarding of public safety.

C. The Submission Gauntlet: BCA (CORENET), SCDF, and Other Agencies

Once the design and documentation are complete and endorsed by the PE, the next step is to submit the plans to the relevant authorities for approval. This often involves navigating a multi-agency process.

• BCA Submission via CORENET e-Submission System:
  The primary submission for building and structural plan approval is made to the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) through its electronic portal, the CORENET (Construction and Real Estate Network) e-Submission System.37
  • The Qualified Person (QP), who can be the PE (for structural plans) or a registered Architect (for building plans), is responsible for making the submission.
  • A crucial prerequisite for BCA building plan submission is obtaining prior Written Permission (WP) or planning permission from the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA).³⁷
  • As part of the preparation, the QP is also required to consult with other relevant technical departments (e.g., Land Transport Authority (LTA) if near MRT lines, National Parks Board (NParks) if affecting trees, Public Utilities Board (PUB) if affecting drainage or water supply) and incorporate their requirements into the plans.³⁷
  • All submitted electronic files (plans, calculations, forms) must be digitally signed by the QP using a recognized certificate.⁴⁶
• SCDF Submission (Fire Safety and Shelter Department – FSSD):
  If the proposed works on non-load bearing walls have implications for fire safety – such as affecting fire compartmentation, means of escape, or fire safety systems – a separate submission of fire safety plans to the SCDF’s Fire Safety and Shelter Department (FSSD) is required.3
  • These plans must demonstrate compliance with the SCDF Fire Code.
  • For complex projects or those involving performance-based fire safety designs, a specialist Fire Safety Engineer (FSE) may need to be engaged to prepare and endorse the fire safety plans.³⁵
• HDB/JTC/MCST Submissions:
  Depending on the property type, additional submissions and approvals will be necessary:
  • HDB: For renovations in HDB flats, an application must be made to HDB, often after obtaining necessary clearances from other agencies like SCDF (e.g., for balcony enclosures).⁸
  • JTC: For works in JTC industrial properties, submissions must follow JTC’s specific guidelines and may require PE endorsement for aspects like internal non-load bearing concrete/masonry walls.³⁹
  • MCST: For private condominiums, endorsed plans and relevant documents usually need to be submitted to the Management Corporation Strata Title for approval before work commences, as per the building’s by-laws.⁸
• Addressing Queries (Requests for Information – RFIs):
  It is common for authorities to raise queries or request clarifications (RFIs) on submitted plans. The PE or QP must respond to these RFIs promptly and comprehensively, providing additional information or making necessary amendments to the plans to address the authorities’ concerns.3

The submission process is often characterized by inter-agency dependencies, which can create critical path challenges in project timelines. For example, URA’s Written Permission is a firm prerequisite before BCA will accept a building plan submission.³⁷ SCDF’s approval for fire safety aspects might be needed before HDB grants its final renovation permit for works like balcony enclosures.²¹ If SCDF requires design changes that have structural implications, the plans submitted to BCA might need to be amended and re-endorsed. This intricate web of approvals means the process is not always linear, nor are agency reviews always independent of one another. Delays in securing approval from one agency can directly impact the ability to proceed with submissions to another. Effective project management and coordination by the QP/PE are therefore crucial to navigate these inter-dependencies successfully. Understanding the critical path of approvals and anticipating potential bottlenecks across different agencies is key to managing project timelines realistically. This complexity is a significant challenge that is often underestimated by clients unfamiliar with the regulatory process.

D. Understanding the PE’s Stamp and Endorsement Certificate

The PE’s endorsement is formally conveyed through their official stamp or seal and accompanying certification on the submitted documents.

• The PE’s Stamp/Seal:
  A Professional Engineer registered with PEB Singapore has the exclusive right to use the title “Professional Engineer” (or its abbreviations “Er.” or “Engr.”) and an official PE stamp or seal.5
  • The design of the PE seal is regulated by PEB. It typically includes the PE’s full name as registered, their PE registration number, and their registered branch of engineering (e.g., Civil, Structural, Mechanical, Electrical).⁴⁸
  • Specialist Professional Engineers (SPEs), who are PEs with proven expertise in more complex and specialized areas of engineering (such as Geotechnical Engineering, Crane Engineering, Lift & Escalator Engineering, etc.), have a revised seal design effective from 1 April 2023. This revised seal explicitly includes the word “Specialist” and denotes their specific specialist branch, giving them greater recognition.⁴⁸
  • When a PE affixes their stamp to engineering drawings, calculations, reports, or application forms, it signifies that they have personally prepared, checked, or supervised the preparation of those documents, and that they take full professional responsibility for their content and compliance with relevant standards and regulations.¹ (Image: Example of a Professional Engineer’s Stamp/Seal Design)
• Endorsement Certificate/Declaration:
  In addition to the stamp, PEs provide formal written certification or declarations on the plans and documents they endorse. These declarations attest to the compliance of the design with relevant Acts, Regulations, and Codes of Practice.
  • For example, a common declaration on a drawing might state, “I hereby certify that I have designed the temporary building(s)/building works shown in these drawings and the relevant provisions of the Building Control (Temporary Buildings) Regulations (Cap 29, Rg 5) have been complied with”.⁴⁹
  • Specific forms often include prescribed declaration formats. For instance, BCA Form BCD BPN C1 is a “Certificate of Supervision for Temporary Building Works” ⁵⁰, and Form BEV/TC is “The Professional Engineer’s Certificate of Inspection and Completion of Temporary Buildings”.⁵¹
  • Submissions for structural plan approval to BCA require specific endorsement certificates from the QP for structural works, as detailed in appendices to BCA’s guidelines.⁴⁵ (Image: Example of PE Declaration on a Submission Form)

The PE’s stamp and signature are not mere administrative formalities; they are marks of profound professional liability. When a PE endorses a document, they are making a legal and ethical declaration that the work represented therein complies with all applicable professional standards, regulatory requirements, and codes of practice. They are also accepting professional responsibility and liability for that design or supervision. This is reinforced by the PEB (Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics) Rules, particularly Rule 12, which mandates PEs to exercise due diligence in ensuring compliance with all written laws and to report any known contraventions.³⁴ This accountability underscores the gravity of the PE’s role and explains the meticulous attention to detail required in their work. It also means that should issues arise due to negligent design, inadequate supervision, or incorrect endorsement, the PE can be held accountable by PEB through disciplinary proceedings, and potentially under civil or criminal law. This inherent liability is a cornerstone of the trust placed in the PE endorsement system and a key reason for the thoroughness (and associated cost) of professional engineering services.

E. Indicative Timelines for Endorsement and Approvals

The timeframe for obtaining PE endorsement and subsequent authority approvals can vary significantly based on several factors. Managing expectations regarding these timelines is crucial for project planning.

• PE Endorsement (Plan Preparation & Internal Review by PE):
  The time taken by the PE to review existing information, prepare necessary designs and calculations, and formally endorse the documents can range from a few working days for very simple and straightforward reviews (e.g., verifying a minor alteration to an exempt non-load bearing wall for MCST submission) to several weeks for more complex designs. This includes situations requiring detailed structural analysis (e.g., for high walls, heavy walls on existing slabs), coordination with other QPs (Architect, M&E PE), or multiple revisions to plans based on initial assessments.3 One source suggests this phase can be “as soon as within 1 working day to a few weeks for submission to authorities”.3
• BCA Approval (after formal submission with all prerequisite clearances):
  BCA has target processing times for applications that are complete and compliant:
  • Structural Plans (where an Accredited Checker’s certificate is not required): 7 working days.⁴⁵
  • Structural Plans (where an Accredited Checker’s certificate is required, typically for larger or more complex projects): 10 working days for the first submission, and 14 working days for subsequent submissions if amendments are needed.⁴⁵
  • Building Plans (architectural plans, assuming all necessary clearances from other technical departments and URA WP are submitted, and BCA’s requirements are met): 7 working days from the date of submission.³⁷
  • Permit to carry out structural works: 7 working days.⁴⁵
• SCDF / Other Agency Approvals:
  The processing times for approvals from SCDF, HDB, JTC, or other relevant agencies can vary widely depending on the complexity of the submission, the agency’s current workload, and whether any site inspections or further clarifications are required. These can range from a few weeks to several months in some cases.
• Overall Timeline:
  Considering all stages, the overall timeline from engaging a PE to receiving all necessary approvals for works involving non-load bearing walls can range from a few weeks for very simple projects with minimal agency involvement, to several months for projects that are more complex, require multiple agency approvals, or encounter significant queries or amendments during the review process.

Table 2: Indicative PE Endorsement & Authority Approval Timelines

 

Process Stage	Indicative Timeframe	Key Dependencies/Factors Affecting Timeline	Source/Reference
Initial PE Consultation & Assessment	1-5 working days	Availability of plans, project complexity, need for site visit	General Practice
PE Design, Calculations & Documentation for Endorsement	1 day – 4 weeks (or more)	Complexity of design, scope of calculations, coordination with other QPs, revisions needed	3
URA Written Permission (if required as prerequisite)	Varies (can be weeks to months)	Project scale, planning compliance, URA workload	37
BCA Structural Plan Review (no AC)	7 working days (from complete submission)	Completeness of submission, no RFIs	45
BCA Structural Plan Review (with AC)	10 working days (1st sub), 14 working days (resub)	Completeness, AC involvement, no RFIs	45
BCA Building Plan Review	7 working days (from complete submission with all clearances)	All prior clearances (URA, TDs) obtained, compliant plans	37
SCDF Plan Review	Varies (typically 2-4 weeks or more)	Complexity, fire engineering involved, SCDF workload	General Industry Experience
HDB/JTC/MCST Approval	Varies (can be days to weeks)	Specific internal processes of these bodies	8
BCA Permit to Commence Works	7 working days (after ST/BP approval & other prerequisites met)	All prior approvals in place	45

Note: These are indicative timelines and can be affected by many project-specific variables. “Working days” for authority review typically commence only after a complete and correct submission is lodged.

A critical factor often overlooked is that the stated processing times by authorities like BCA (e.g., “7 working days”) only begin once a complete and correct application, along with all prerequisite documents (such as URA Written Permission and clearances from other technical departments), has been successfully lodged.³⁷ If the submission is incomplete, contains errors, or fails to address all regulatory requirements, it will likely be rejected outright or face significant delays due to RFIs from the authorities. This effectively pushes out the actual approval timeline considerably. The PE’s role in meticulously preparing and ensuring the completeness and correctness of the submission package is therefore vital to achieving these target review times. This aspect is a common source of frustration for applicants and a significant challenge in managing client expectations regarding project schedules.

VI. Meeting the Mark: Essential Design and Compliance Requirements for Non-Load Bearing Walls

Once it’s established that PE endorsement is required for non-load bearing wall works, the design and construction must adhere to a range of compliance requirements. These span structural stability, material properties (especially fire safety), performance standards, and ethical obligations of the PE.

A. Ensuring Structural Stability: Lateral Loads, Bracing, Deflection Limits, and Connections

Even though non-load bearing walls do not support vertical loads from the primary building structure, they must be designed to be inherently stable and capable of resisting various forces they may encounter during their service life.

• Lateral Load Resistance:
  Non-load bearing walls, particularly internal partitions and those acting as barriers, must be designed to withstand horizontal forces. Key lateral loads to consider include:
  • Horizontal Imposed Loads: These arise from human activity (e.g., people leaning or pushing against a wall, accidental impacts from trolleys or furniture) and crowd pressure in assembly areas. The Singapore National Annex to SS EN 1991-1-1:2008 (Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-1: General actions – Densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings) provides specific characteristic values for horizontal line loads (qk) to be applied to partition walls and parapets that act as barriers. These values are detailed in Table NA.8 of the National Annex (which replaces Table 6.12 of the base Eurocode EN 1991-1-1) and vary depending on the building’s occupancy category (e.g., residential, office, retail, assembly areas, industrial) and the specific use of the area the wall encloses.⁵² For example, areas susceptible to large crowds like theatres or shopping malls require a much higher design horizontal load (3.0 kN/m) compared to internal residential areas (0.36 kN/m or 0.74 kN/m).
  • Wind Loads: While primarily a concern for external walls, internal non-load bearing walls in very large, open-plan industrial or commercial buildings, or walls that might be temporarily exposed during phased construction, may need to be designed for wind pressure. SS EN 1991-1-4 and its Singapore National Annex provide guidance on wind actions.
  • Accidental Loads: In some specific situations, non-load bearing walls might need to be designed to resist accidental loads, such as impact from vehicles in car parks or industrial settings. SS EN 1991-1-7 and its Singapore National Annex cover accidental actions.⁵⁴
• Bracing and Stiffening:
  For tall non-load bearing walls (BCA advisory suggests particular attention for those exceeding 3.3 meters in height 11) or those constructed from large, slender panels, additional bracing or stiffening may be necessary to ensure lateral stability and prevent excessive deflection or vibration.
  • The design PE should consider options such as incorporating vertical stiffeners (e.g., steel posts) or horizontal lintels/beams within or alongside the wall panel.¹¹
  • The connections between these bracing elements themselves, and their connections to the primary building structure (e.g., floor slabs, columns, roof structure), must be designed to be rigid and adequately restrained to effectively transfer lateral loads.¹¹ (Image: Bracing Systems for High Non-Load Bearing Walls)
• Deflection Limits:
  Non-load bearing walls should not deflect excessively under applied loads. Excessive deflection can lead to damage to surface finishes (e.g., cracking of plaster or tiles), damage to adjacent non-structural elements (e.g., abutting partitions, door frames), jamming of doors, or cause undue alarm to occupants.
  • Singapore Standard SS 492:2001 (2014) specifies maximum deflection and residual deformation limits for partition walls when subjected to the Stiffness Test, with varying criteria for different duty grades (Light, Medium, Heavy, Severe).¹² For example, for Medium Duty, the maximum deflection is 20 mm, and maximum residual deformation is 3 mm under a 500 N static load.
  • The Eurocodes, along with their Singapore National Annexes (NAs), provide general guidance on serviceability limit states, including deflection control. The UK National Annex to BS EN 1990 (Eurocode: Basis of structural design) provides examples of limiting values for horizontal deflections, suggesting that for partitions, cracking should be avoided.⁵⁵ While specific quantitative limits for non-load bearing internal partitions might be project-specific or agreed with the client as per Eurocode principles, the general intent is to ensure serviceability. BCA’s Approved Document ²⁸ would typically refer to these Eurocode NAs for acceptable solutions. The IRC Table R301.7 (though an American code) suggests H/180 for interior walls and partitions, which is sometimes referenced as a general guide if local NAs are not explicit for all cases.⁵⁶ However, adherence to Singapore-specific NAs is paramount.
• Connections:
  The way non-load bearing walls are connected to the main building structure (floors, ceilings, columns, and other walls) is critical for their stability and performance.
  • Connections must be designed to safely transfer any applied lateral loads from the wall to the structure.
  • They should also accommodate potential building movements (e.g., deflection of supporting slabs or beams, thermal expansion/contraction) to prevent cracking or distress in the wall or its finishes. This often involves providing movement joints or using flexible connections at the head or perimeter of the wall.
  • Proper interface treatment is particularly important when different materials are used for the wall and its bracing elements (e.g., a concrete block wall with steel stiffeners). Effective movement-control measures, such as using appropriate sealants or separation layers, should be applied at these interfaces to prevent unsightly movement cracks.¹¹ (Image: Typical Connection Details for Non-Load Bearing Partition Wall)

The following table summarizes the horizontal imposed loads for internal partitions and barriers as per the Singapore National Annex to SS EN 1991-1-1:

Table 3: Horizontal Imposed Loads on Internal Partitions/Barriers (Summary from Singapore National Annex to SS EN 1991-1-1:2008, Table NA.8)

Category of Loaded Area	Specific Use / Sub-category	Prescribed Horizontal Line Load qk (kN/m)
A: Areas for domestic and residential activities	All areas within or serving exclusively one dwelling (incl. stairs, landings etc., excl. external balconies and edges of roofs)	0.36
	Residential areas not covered by the above	0.74
	External balconies and edges of roofs	0.74
B & C1: Office areas; Areas where people may congregate (areas with tables etc.)	Areas not susceptible to overcrowding in office and institutional buildings; reading rooms; classrooms including stairs	0.74
	Restaurants and cafes	1.5
C2, C3, C4 & D: Areas where people may congregate (areas with fixed seats etc.); Areas without obstacles for moving people; Areas with possible physical activities; Retail areas	Areas having fixed seating within 530 mm of the barrier, balustrade or parapet	1.5
	Stairs, landings, balustrades, corridors and ramps	0.74
	All retail areas	1.5
C5: Areas susceptible to large crowds	Footways or pavements < 3 m wide adjacent to sunken areas	1.5
	Theatres, cinemas, discotheques, bars, auditoria, shopping malls, assembly areas, studios	3.0
	Grandstands and stadia	See requirements of the appropriate certifying authority
E: Areas for storage and industrial activities	Industrial and storage buildings except as given by the following two sub-categories	0.74
	Light pedestrian traffic routes in industrial and storage buildings except designated escape routes	0.36
	Light access stairs and gangways not more than 600 mm wide	0.22
F & G: Traffic and parking areas for light/heavy vehicles	Pedestrian areas in car parks including stairs, landings, ramps, edges or internal floors, footways, edges of roofs	1.5
	Horizontal loads imposed by vehicles	See SS EN 1991-1-1:2008, Annex B

Source: Adapted from NA to SS EN 1991-1-1:2008, Table NA.8.⁵² Always refer to the full standard for complete details and application notes.

The emphasis on lateral load resistance, appropriate bracing, deflection control, and robust connections highlights that the structural design of non-load bearing walls is not a trivial matter. While the term “non-load bearing” correctly indicates the absence of vertical structural load transfer from the building frame, these walls must possess inherent stability to withstand a variety of horizontal forces encountered in their specific use environment. For instance, high, slender walls are particularly susceptible to buckling or overturning if not adequately designed and braced against such forces. The PE’s design task therefore involves a comprehensive analysis of various load cases beyond simple self-weight, ensuring that the entire wall system, including its constituent materials, connections, and any necessary bracing, is sufficiently robust and serviceable for its intended function and location. This is a key area where professional engineering expertise is indispensable for ensuring both safety and long-term performance.

B. Material Matters: Non-Combustibility, Fire Resistance, and Lightweight Options

The choice of materials for non-load bearing walls is heavily influenced by fire safety regulations, in addition to structural and functional requirements.

• Non-Combustibility:
  A primary consideration, especially for internal walls, is non-combustibility.
  • The SCDF Fire Code, Clause 3.15.12, explicitly states that all internal non-load-bearing walls in residential units must be constructed of non-combustible materials.¹⁵
  • More broadly, any element of structure that is required to have a fire resistance rating must generally be constructed of non-combustible materials. The fire resistance is determined by the part constructed wholly of non-combustible materials.¹⁴
  • Materials like timber are inherently combustible. If timber members are used in the construction of a fire-rated compartment wall (e.g., as studs or supports within a partition), the assembly would typically not meet the non-combustibility requirement unless the timber is specifically treated to achieve fire retardancy and the entire assembly (including the timber components) has been successfully fire-tested and listed as a compliant fire-rated system.¹⁴
• Fire Resistance:
  Non-load bearing walls that serve as fire barriers, such as compartment walls (dividing a building into fire-tight sections) or separating walls (between different occupancies or units), must achieve a specific fire resistance rating.
  • This rating, typically expressed in minutes or hours (e.g., 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours), indicates the duration for which the wall can withstand a standard fire test while maintaining its integrity (preventing passage of flames and hot gases) and insulation (limiting temperature rise on the unexposed face).¹⁴
  • The required fire resistance period depends on the building’s purpose group, height, and the specific function of the wall, as stipulated in Table 3.3A of the SCDF Fire Code.¹⁴ For example, a separating wall is generally required to have at least a 1-hour fire resistance rating.¹⁴
  • Annex 3A of the Fire Code provides “deemed-to-satisfy” provisions, offering tables of minimum thicknesses for various masonry constructions (e.g., reinforced concrete, brickwork, concrete blocks) to achieve specified fire resistance periods without needing specific fire tests, provided they meet the material and construction criteria outlined.⁵⁷
  • For dry construction assemblies (e.g., plasterboard partitions), especially those incorporating services within the cavity, specific fire testing of the proposed assembly is often required to validate its fire rating. The Fire Code outlines procedures for testing and assessment of such systems.¹⁴
• Lightweight Materials:
  The Building Control Regulations define “lightweight material” for partitions to include 7:
  • Sheet or board materials such as timber board, plywood, fibreboard, plasterboard, aluminium sheet, corrugated metal sheet, or polycarbonate sheet.
  • Hollow concrete blocks, hollow glass blocks, autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) blocks, and similar products. The use of such lightweight materials is often a condition for certain exemptions from full plan approval or for simplified requirements for partitions, particularly in non-landed residential buildings or commercial spaces.⁷
• Considerations for “Heavy” Non-Load Bearing Walls:
  As noted by BCA, masonry walls constructed from materials like brick, solid concrete blocks, or stone, even if intended to be non-load bearing, are considered “heavy”.7 Their substantial self-weight can impose significant dead loads on the supporting floor slabs or beams. Therefore, before erecting such walls, consultation with BCA or a PE is advised to assess the structural implications for the supporting elements.

Fire safety compliance is a dominant driver in the selection of materials for internal non-load bearing walls in Singapore. The SCDF Fire Code’s stringent rules regarding non-combustibility and fire resistance, particularly for walls in residential units and those forming essential fire compartmentation, significantly influence design choices.¹⁴ While a wall might be structurally “non-load bearing” in terms of carrying primary building loads, its performance in a fire scenario is of utmost importance. These fire safety requirements can limit the range of permissible materials or necessitate the use of specific fire-rated assemblies that have been tested and certified. Consequently, a PE or QP involved in the design or endorsement of a non-load bearing wall cannot consider its structural aspects in isolation from its fire safety obligations. The SCDF Fire Code serves as a primary design document alongside structural codes and standards. This interplay is a common area where compliance can become challenging if not addressed comprehensively and early in the design process by the engaged PE.

C. Adherence to Singapore Standard SS 492: Performance for Partition Walls

A key standard governing the performance of non-load bearing internal partition walls in Singapore is SS 492:2001 (Re-confirmed 2014) – Performance requirements for strength and robustness (including methods of test) for partition walls.¹¹ This standard is often referenced in project specifications and by BCA, particularly in the context of buildable design.

SS 492 specifies a series of performance requirements and test methods designed to assess the strength, robustness, and serviceability of partition wall systems. It establishes four duty grades for partition walls, reflecting the level of activity and potential for impact in the spaces they enclose:

• Light Duty (LD): Minimal stiffness required; suitable for areas with a small chance of impact load (e.g., domestic accommodation).
• Medium Duty (MD): Moderate stiffness required; suitable for areas with some chance of accidental impact (e.g., general office accommodation).
• Heavy Duty (HD): High stiffness required; suitable for areas with a higher chance of impact loads (e.g., public circulation areas, light industrial areas).
• Severe Duty (SD): Highest robustness required; suitable for areas prone to vandalism or abnormally rough use (e.g., major circulation areas in public buildings, heavy industrial areas, some institutional uses).

The standard outlines several key performance tests, each with specific procedures and acceptance criteria for the different duty grades ¹²:

• Stiffness Test: Measures the deflection of the partition under a static horizontal load (500 N applied at 1.4 m height) and its residual deformation after the load is removed.
• Small Hard Body Impact Test: Assesses resistance to surface damage and perforation from impacts by a 3 kg steel sphere (simulating sharp objects like trolleys). Impact energy levels vary by duty grade.
• Large Soft Body Impact Test: Evaluates resistance to damage and structural integrity when impacted by a 50 kg spheroconical bag (simulating a person falling against the wall). Impact energy levels vary by duty grade.
• Door Slam Test: Assesses the partition’s ability (and its door frame fixings) to withstand repeated door slamming forces. Test door leaf mass and number of slams vary by duty grade.
• Crowd Pressure Test: Determines the partition’s capacity to resist a continuous horizontal line load (0.75 kN/m, 1.5 kN/m, or 3.0 kN/m) applied through a beam at 1.2 m height (simulating crowd leaning).
• Lightweight Anchorages Test: Checks the ability of the partition to support light fixtures (e.g., picture hooks) via pull-out (100 N axial load) and pull-down (250 N transverse load) tests.
• Heavyweight Anchorages Test: Assesses the capacity of the partition to support heavy fixtures like wall cupboards (up to 4000 N) and wash basins (up to 1500 N) using specific bracket arrangements and load applications.

Table 4: Key Performance Tests & Criteria under SS 492 (Illustrative Examples)

 

Test Name	Brief Test Objective / Simulated Scenario	Example Acceptance Criterion / Performance Metric (Illustrative)	Reference
Stiffness	Resistance to bending from leaning	MD Grade: Max Deflection ≤ 20 mm, Max Residual Deformation ≤ 3 mm (under 500N load)	SS 492 12
Small Hard Body Impact: Perforation	Resistance to penetration by sharp objects	HD Grade: No perforation at 15 Nm impact energy	SS 492 12
Large Soft Body Impact: Structural Damage	Resistance to collapse from heavy impacts (person falling)	HD/SD Grade: No collapse/dislocation at 120 Nm impact energy	SS 492 12
Crowd Pressure	Resistance to sustained leaning by a crowd	No collapse/dangerous dislodgement under specified line load (e.g., 1.5 kN/m)	SS 492 9
Heavyweight Anchorage: Wash Basin	Ability to support a wash basin	Withstand 1500 N load; Max Deflection ≤ 20 mm, Max Residual Deformation ≤ 1 mm	SS 492 12

Source: Adapted from SS 492:2001 (R2014) as detailed in.¹² Always refer to the full standard for complete test methods and criteria.

The comprehensive suite of tests in SS 492 ensures that partition walls are fit for their intended purpose, going beyond basic stability considerations. It addresses the practical durability and usability aspects that are crucial for occupant satisfaction and long-term performance. A partition wall might be structurally stable in terms of not collapsing, but if it is easily damaged by everyday impacts, cannot adequately support common fixtures, or deflects excessively, it will not be deemed satisfactory. The duty grading system allows designers and specifiers to match the robustness of the partition wall system to the anticipated level of use and abuse in a particular space. For projects where compliance with SS 492 is specified (e.g., to achieve certain Buildability Scores as per BCA requirements ¹², or in public building tenders), PE endorsement would involve verifying that the chosen proprietary wall system has the necessary test certifications for the required duty grade, or that a site-built partition is designed and constructed to meet those performance levels.

D. Acoustic Considerations for Non-Load Bearing Walls

Non-load bearing walls, particularly internal partitions, play a vital role in providing acoustic separation between rooms and different spaces within a building. Adequate acoustic performance is essential for occupant comfort, privacy, and productivity, whether in residential apartments, offices, classrooms, or healthcare facilities.¹⁶

Key metrics used to quantify acoustic performance include:

• Sound Transmission Class (STC): This single-number rating measures how well a building partition (like a wall, floor, or ceiling) attenuates airborne sound.¹⁶ A higher STC rating indicates better sound insulation, meaning less sound is transmitted through the partition. For example, walls separating bedrooms or meeting rooms would typically require higher STC ratings to ensure privacy.
• Noise Reduction Coefficient (NRC): This rating measures the sound absorption capability of a material or surface.¹⁶ It indicates how much sound energy is absorbed when it strikes a surface, rather than being reflected. While NRC is more relevant for surface finishes (like acoustic panels or ceiling tiles) used to control reverberation and echo within a room, the construction of the wall itself can influence the overall acoustic environment.

Several design and construction factors influence the acoustic performance of non-load bearing walls:

• Mass: Generally, heavier and denser walls provide better sound insulation (higher STC).
• Air-tightness: Sound can easily travel through gaps and cracks. Ensuring all joints, perimeters, and service penetrations are properly sealed is crucial.
• Isolation/Decoupling: Creating a discontinuity in the sound transmission path, for example, by using double-stud construction with an air gap, or by incorporating resilient channels to mount plasterboard, can significantly improve STC ratings.
• Cavity Insulation: Filling the cavity in stud walls with sound-absorbing insulation material (like fiberglass or mineral wool batts) can enhance sound insulation by reducing resonance and absorbing sound energy within the cavity.
• Flanking Transmission: Sound can bypass a partition by travelling through adjoining structures (e.g., floors, ceilings, external walls). Proper detailing at junctions is necessary to minimize flanking transmission.

While the Building Control Act may not prescribe specific mandatory STC ratings for all types of non-load bearing walls across all building types, certain occupancies (e.g., residential buildings, hotels, schools, healthcare facilities) often have recommended or required acoustic performance levels. These may be stipulated in specific codes of practice, design guidelines, or project tender documents. For instance, Green Building rating schemes like BCA’s Green Mark often include criteria for acoustic comfort, which would influence the design of internal partitions.¹⁶

(Image: Sound Transmission Through a Partition Wall)

Although PE endorsement for BCA submission primarily focuses on structural safety and compliance with building codes (including fire safety), acoustic performance is an increasingly important consideration for overall building quality and occupant well-being. While a PE might not always be directly responsible for detailed acoustic design unless it’s a specialized project (e.g., a concert hall or recording studio, where an acoustic consultant would typically be involved), they should be aware of the acoustic implications of non-load bearing wall design. In many projects, particularly high-end residential or commercial developments, specific STC ratings will be part of the design brief. In such cases, the PE may need to ensure that the endorsed wall construction can achieve these targets, potentially by incorporating details recommended by an acoustic consultant or by selecting proprietary systems with certified acoustic performance. Failure to adequately address acoustics can result in a building that is structurally safe and compliant but functionally unsatisfactory due to noise issues. This represents a “quality of life” aspect that good engineering and architectural practice should proactively consider.

E. The PE’s Ethical Obligations: Adherence to PEB Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics

The PE’s role in endorsing plans for non-load bearing walls is underpinned by a strict code of professional conduct and ethics, enforced by the Professional Engineers Board (PEB) Singapore. This code ensures that PEs act with integrity, competence, and a primary regard for public safety. Key ethical obligations relevant to this process include:

• Upholding the Dignity and Reputation of the Profession: PEs are required to conduct themselves in a manner that upholds the dignity, standing, and reputation of the engineering profession [³⁴, Rule 2(1), ³⁴]. This includes providing services competently and ethically.
• Fidelity to Employer or Client: PEs must discharge their duties to their employer or client with complete fidelity, acting in their best interests while adhering to professional standards [³⁴, Rule 3(1), ³⁴].
• Paramount Regard for Public Interest: Notwithstanding their duties to their employer or client, a PE must always act with prime regard for the public interest. If there is a conflict between client interests and public safety, public safety must take precedence.³⁴
• Due Diligence and Compliance with Law: This is a cornerstone of their endorsement role. Rule 12 of the PEB Code of Ethics mandates that a PE “shall exercise due diligence to ensure that there is no contravention of or failure to comply with any written law by any person in the carrying out of any building project or works of which the professional engineer is the consultant or engineer” and “shall report to the appropriate authority any contravention of or failure to comply with any written law… if such contravention or failure comes to his knowledge”.³⁴ This directly applies to ensuring that endorsed plans for non-load bearing walls comply with the Building Control Act, Fire Safety Act, and all other relevant regulations and standards.
• Competence: PEs must only undertake professional engineering work that they are competent to perform by virtue of their training and experience.
• Avoiding Conflicts of Interest: PEs must be transparent about any potential conflicts of interest and avoid situations where their professional judgment could be compromised [³⁴, Rule 3(3), 3(6), ³⁴].

The PEB Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics serves as the unseen but crucial foundation of trust in the PE endorsement system. The entire framework relies on the fundamental assumption that PEs will consistently act ethically, exercise their professional skills competently, and prioritize the public interest above all else. Rule 12, concerning due diligence and the obligation to report legal contraventions, is particularly significant. It effectively positions PEs as an integral part of the regulatory enforcement mechanism, extending the reach of authorities like BCA and SCDF. If a PE were to knowingly or negligently endorse designs that are non-compliant or unsafe, they would not only be violating this ethical code but also be subject to disciplinary action by PEB, which could include fines, suspension, or revocation of their license to practice. This robust ethical framework is what imbues the PE’s stamp and endorsement with its true weight and authority. It signifies more than just a technical review; it is a professional attestation bound by profound ethical duties and responsibilities. This should provide considerable assurance to the public, clients, and regulatory bodies that the PE endorsement process is conducted with integrity and a steadfast commitment to safety.

VII. Overcoming Hurdles: Common Challenges in PE Endorsement for Non-Load Bearing Walls

Despite the established procedures and guidelines, obtaining PE endorsement for non-load bearing wall modifications in Singapore is not always straightforward. Stakeholders often encounter a range of challenges, from technical misjudgments to complex administrative navigation and unforeseen on-site issues.

A. Misidentification of Wall Types and Its Repercussions

One of the most fundamental and potentially costly challenges is the misidentification of wall types by homeowners or contractors.⁸

• The Challenge: Untrained individuals may incorrectly assume a wall is non-load bearing when it, in fact, plays a structural role, or they might underestimate the structural significance of elements like party walls or concealed stiffeners within seemingly simple partitions. This often stems from a desire to save time or the cost of professional assessment.
• The Repercussions: Proceeding with hacking or alterations based on such misidentification can lead to severe consequences. If a load-bearing wall is compromised, it can result in localized or even widespread structural damage, posing immediate safety risks to occupants. Authorities like BCA or HDB can issue stop-work orders, impose fines for unauthorized works, and mandate the costly and disruptive reinstatement of the affected structural elements to their original condition.⁸ The legal and financial liabilities can be substantial.

The “assumption trap” – where individuals bypass professional verification based on incomplete knowledge or visual cues – represents a significant gamble. Common misconceptions, such as “all internal walls are non-load bearing,” are not universally true and can lead to dangerous errors. This underscores the critical importance of mandatory checks, such as HDB’s requirement for permits for all wall hacking activities ⁸, and reinforces the strong advisory to always verify wall types through official building plans or by engaging a qualified PE before commencing any demolition or alteration work. The relatively minor upfront cost of professional verification pales in comparison to the potential costs associated with rectifying structural damage or addressing a safety incident.

B. Navigating Regulatory Ambiguities and Inter-Agency Coordination

The multi-layered regulatory environment in Singapore, while ensuring comprehensive oversight, can present significant navigational challenges.

• The Challenge: Understanding the precise nuances of exemptions for “insignificant building works” ⁷, determining which agency’s specific requirements take precedence in overlapping areas, and coordinating submissions and approvals across multiple bodies (BCA, SCDF, URA, HDB, JTC) can be complex and time-consuming.³
• Examples of Complexity:
  • The process for HDB balcony enclosures requires PE submission to SCDF for fire safety approval before HDB will issue its renovation permit.²¹
  • A project might require URA planning permission, then BCA building plan approval, and concurrent SCDF fire safety plan approval, each with its own submission portal (e.g., BCA’s CORENET ³⁷, SCDF’s separate system ³⁶) and review timeline.
  • Coordination is also essential among different Qualified Persons if multiple specialists are involved – for instance, an Architectural QP, a Structural PE, an M&E PE, and potentially a Fire Safety Engineer (FSE) – all of whom need to ensure their respective designs are integrated and compliant.³⁵

This fragmentation of information and authority, where different agencies oversee different aspects of the same project, often using distinct submission platforms and processes, can make the approval journey feel like navigating a maze for applicants.⁶⁰ The QP or PE typically acts as the central coordinator, responsible for understanding all applicable requirements and ensuring that submissions are correctly routed and followed up. This fragmentation is a primary contributor to potential delays and can be a source of frustration for clients. It highlights the need for experienced QPs and PEs who are not only technically proficient but also adept at navigating this complex administrative system. For property owners, having a clear understanding of this multi-agency involvement from the outset can help in managing expectations regarding project timelines and potential complexities.

C. The “Immaterial” vs. “Material” Change Dilemma

BCA Circular BCA BC 15.0.3 (13 March 2014) and subsequent clarifications provide guidelines on what constitutes “immaterial changes” to approved non-structural building works, including non-load bearing walls.³⁰ Such changes generally do not require prior plan approval before construction, although record plans reflecting the as-built changes must be submitted to BCA later. However, correctly distinguishing between an “immaterial” and a “material” change can be challenging.

• The Challenge: While the BCA circular provides some quantitative guidance (e.g., changes to the area or positions of non-load bearing walls not exceeding 20% of the total area of non-load bearing walls on the affected floor are generally considered immaterial ³⁰), the ultimate determination often relies on the QP’s professional judgment. A “material change” is one that would typically require a re-design of key elements or significantly alters the compliance of the original approved plans.
• The Risk: If a QP misclassifies a material change as immaterial and proceeds with construction without obtaining prior approval for an amendment plan, this can lead to non-compliance being identified by BCA at a later stage (e.g., during a TOP inspection or upon review of the submitted record plans). Such a situation could result in requirements for costly rectification work, re-submission of plans, or even penalties. The situation is further complicated if a change is deemed immaterial under one regulatory clause (e.g., related to ventilation) but inadvertently causes non-compliance under another clause (e.g., energy efficiency or fire safety).³⁰

This dilemma underscores the careful judgment and conservative approach that PEs and QPs must exercise. The intent of the “immaterial change” provision is to streamline the process for minor deviations that do not compromise safety or overall compliance. However, the responsibility for accurate classification rests squarely with the QP. When in doubt, it is generally safer and more prudent to err on the side of caution and submit an amendment plan for BCA’s approval rather than risk a post-construction compliance issue. This highlights the nuanced decision-making that PEs routinely undertake in their practice.

D. On-Site Deviations and Ensuring As-Built Compliance

A PE’s endorsement applies to the design and plans submitted. A significant challenge lies in ensuring that the actual construction work carried out on-site faithfully adheres to these endorsed plans.

• The Challenge: Deviations from approved plans can occur on site for various reasons: unforeseen site conditions (e.g., discovery of hidden services or structural elements not shown on existing plans), contractor error or oversight, or client-initiated changes made after approvals have been obtained.
• The PE’s Role and Responsibility: If a PE is engaged for site supervision, they are responsible for monitoring the works and ensuring compliance with the endorsed plans. Even if not directly supervising, the PEB Code of Ethics (Rule 12) obligates PEs to exercise due diligence and report any known contraventions of written law in projects they are associated with.³⁴ Site supervisors, who may or may not be the design PE, also play a critical role in overseeing construction quality and adherence to plans.⁴⁵
• Record Plans: For immaterial changes that are permissible without prior amendment approval, QPs are still required to meticulously document these deviations and incorporate them into “record plans” (as-built drawings), which are then submitted to BCA, typically before or with the application for a Temporary Occupation Permit (TOP) or Certificate of Statutory Completion (CSC).³⁰

The PE’s endorsement of a design is not the final step in ensuring a safe and compliant outcome; rigorous site control during the construction phase is equally critical. An impeccably designed and fully compliant set of PE-endorsed plans is rendered ineffective if the contractor on site fails to implement them correctly. Unmanaged or unapproved deviations can nullify the original regulatory approvals, introduce new safety risks, or lead to non-compliance with building codes. This is where the quality of site supervision, whether by the design PE (if their scope includes supervision), a separate supervising PE, or other qualified site supervisors, becomes paramount. Effective communication of the design intent to the construction team and vigilance in monitoring site works are essential to bridge any gap between the “as-designed” and the “as-built” condition. For clients, this means selecting competent contractors who are committed to following endorsed plans and specifications. For PEs, it underscores the importance of clear design documentation and, if involved in supervision, diligent oversight.

E. Cost Factors: PE Fees, Submission Charges, and Construction Costs

The overall cost of modifying non-load bearing walls, including PE endorsement, can be a significant concern for property owners. These costs can be broken down into several components:

• PE Endorsement Fees: The professional fees charged by a PE for their services (which can include initial consultation, site assessment, design work, preparation of calculations, endorsement of plans, and managing submissions to authorities) vary considerably. Factors influencing these fees include the complexity of the project, the experience and reputation of the PE, the scope of services required (e.g., design only vs. design and supervision), the number of site visits needed, and the extent of documentation and submissions involved. For relatively simple endorsements for minor non-load bearing wall alterations, fees might range from several hundred to a few thousand Singapore dollars. For more substantial Addition & Alteration (A&A) projects involving significant structural changes (which may or may not include non-load bearing wall aspects), PE fees can be considerably higher, potentially ranging from $27,000 to $40,000 SGD or more, as indicated for larger landed property A&A projects.⁶¹ However, for typical non-load bearing wall endorsements not part of such large-scale A&A, the PE fees would be substantially lower.⁶²
• Authority Submission Fees: Various government agencies charge fees for processing applications and permits. These can include:
  • BCA: Fees for building plan (BP) and structural plan (ST) submissions, permit to commence works.³⁷
  • SCDF: Fees for fire safety plan submissions.
  • URA: Fees for planning permission applications.
  • HDB: Permit fees for renovations in HDB flats (e.g., a basic HDB permit fee is around SGD 20, but additional charges may apply for more complex works requiring extensive review or inspections).⁶²
• Construction Costs: These are the direct costs associated with the physical work, including:
  • Hacking/Demolition: Costs vary based on wall type (e.g., drywall vs. masonry), thickness, height, and accessibility. Hacking a simple non-load bearing drywall partition might cost $300-$1,000 SGD per wall.⁶²
  • New Wall Erection: Costs depend on the material (e.g., drywall, lightweight blocks, glass), length, height, and complexity of the new wall.
  • Making Good: Repairing and finishing surfaces (floors, ceilings, adjacent walls) affected by the wall alterations.
  • Finishes: Plastering, skimming, painting, tiling, etc.
  • Debris Disposal: Costs for removing and legally disposing of construction debris, which can range from $100 to $500 SGD or more depending on volume.⁶²
  • Ancillary Works: Potential costs for re-routing electrical wiring, plumbing, or air-conditioning ducts if they are affected by wall modifications ($200-$500 SGD per room for electrical/plumbing adjustments).⁶²

Table 5: Breakdown of Potential Costs Associated with Non-Load Bearing Wall Modifications & PE Endorsement (Indicative)

 

Cost Item	Indicative Cost Range (SGD)	Factors Influencing This Cost	Source/Reference (Illustrative)
PE Initial Consultation Fee	$100 – $500+	Complexity, site visit needed, PE experience	General Industry Estimates
PE Design & Endorsement Fee (Simple NLBW mods)	$500 – $2,500+	Scope, calculations needed, number of plans, submissions handled	61 (extrapolated for simpler NLBW cases)
BCA Plan Submission Fees (BP/ST)	Varies based on GFA/project value	Scale of overall project if part of larger works	BCA Fee Schedules
SCDF Plan Submission Fees	Varies	Complexity of fire safety aspects	SCDF Fee Schedules
HDB Renovation Permit Fee	$20 (basic) + potentially others	Type of HDB works	62
Wall Hacking Cost (per wall, non-load bearing)	$300 – $1,000	Wall material, size, accessibility	62
New Partition Wall Cost (per m² or per wall)	Varies widely ($50-$300+/m² for materials like tiles/laminate, potentially more for full wall construction)	Material, height, length, finishes	63 (material costs), General Contractor Quotes
Debris Disposal	$100 – $500+	Volume of debris, type of waste	62
Making Good & Finishing (patching, painting)	$50 – $150 per m² (patching) + painting costs	Extent of affected areas, quality of finish	62
Electrical/Plumbing Adjustments (if needed)	$200 – $500 per trade/room	Extent of re-routing	62

Note: These are broad estimates. Actual costs can vary significantly. Always obtain detailed, itemized quotes.

A common challenge related to costs is the issue of “hidden” or unbudgeted expenses. Initial quotes from contractors, particularly for hacking works, might not always encompass the full spectrum of associated costs.³⁸ For example, a basic hacking quote might exclude the PE endorsement fees (if the contractor does not bundle this service or if direct engagement of a PE by the owner is necessary), the various authority submission fees, or the costs of rectifying unforeseen issues such as damaged services concealed within the walls.⁶³ It is therefore crucial for property owners to request and scrutinize detailed, itemized quotations from contractors. These quotes should clearly delineate what services and costs are included (e.g., PE endorsement, authority submissions, specific types of making good) and what is excluded. Understanding the full scope of potential costs upfront can help prevent budget overruns, disputes, and financial stress during the renovation project.

F. Dealing with Existing Structures and Unforeseen Conditions

Renovation and alteration projects in existing buildings inherently carry a degree of uncertainty, as as-built conditions on site may not always perfectly match available plans, or unexpected elements may be discovered once work commences.

• The Challenge:
  • Discrepancies in Plans: Existing building plans, especially for older properties, might be outdated, inaccurate, or may not reflect previous undocumented alterations.
  • Hidden Elements: During demolition or opening-up works, workers might encounter concealed services (pipes, wires), unexpected structural components (e.g., embedded beams or stiffeners), or materials different from what was anticipated.
  • Condition of Existing Structures: The condition of existing elements to which new non-load bearing walls are to be connected (e.g., slabs, columns) might be found to be compromised or unsuitable for the proposed connections. This is particularly relevant for party walls, where activities like chasing (cutting grooves) or embedding new structural elements can weaken the existing wall if not done correctly.¹⁹
• The PE’s Role: When such unforeseen conditions arise, the PE (if involved in the project) needs to conduct further site investigations, re-assess the original design, and determine if any modifications to the plans or construction methods are necessary.⁶⁴ This might involve revising calculations, detailing new connection methods, or specifying alternative materials. Any significant changes to the endorsed design would likely require amendments to be submitted to the relevant authorities for re-approval.
• The Impact: Dealing with unforeseen conditions can inevitably lead to project delays as work may need to halt pending re-assessment and approval of revised plans. It can also result in increased construction costs due to additional design work, changes in materials, or more complex construction methods.

In renovation projects, PEs and contractors often encounter “known unknowns” (risks that are anticipated but whose exact impact is uncertain) and “unknown unknowns” (risks that were not anticipated at all). The BCA seminar on lessons learned from structural failures, for instance, highlighted cases where existing party walls were weakened by adjacent construction activities, leading to collapses.¹⁹ Similarly, if as-built information about an existing structure is incomplete or unavailable, a PE undertaking a design for alterations may need to conduct additional checks, such as concrete core tests or non-destructive testing, to verify the existing structure’s strength and integrity before proceeding.⁶⁴ This inherent uncertainty in working with existing structures means that contingency planning, both in terms of project timeline and budget, is essential. PEs need to be adaptable in their approach, and clients must understand that unforeseen issues can arise, potentially requiring design adjustments and further PE endorsement or authority approvals.

G. Challenges in PE Certification for Partition Walls (Specific Issues)

Beyond the general challenges of PE endorsement, specific technical issues can arise in the certification of non-load bearing partition walls:

• Meeting SS 492 Performance Grades: Ensuring that proprietary partition systems or site-built partitions meet the specified duty grades (Light, Medium, Heavy, or Severe Duty) under SS 492 for stiffness, impact resistance, and anchorage capacity can be challenging. This often requires reliance on manufacturer’s test certificates for proprietary systems or careful design and construction for site-built walls to achieve the desired performance levels.¹² Lack of readily available test data for some systems can complicate verification.
• Cracking at Joints in Precast Panel Walls: A common problem observed with precast panel partition systems is the occurrence of hairline cracks at the joints between adjacent panels. These cracks can be due to various factors, including shrinkage of freshly cast panels, improper grouting techniques (e.g., incorrect mix, insufficient grout, premature grouting of vertical joints), inadequate surface preparation, or structural movements in the main building frame.¹² Preventing such cracks requires meticulous attention to installation methods and material compatibility.
• Stability of High Non-Load Bearing Walls: As previously discussed, non-load bearing walls exceeding 3.3 meters in height require specific PE (Civil) design involvement to ensure their stability against lateral loads. This involves careful consideration of bracing, stiffening, and connection details.¹¹
• Ensuring Non-Combustibility and Fire Ratings: Meeting the SCDF Fire Code requirements for non-combustibility of materials (especially in residential units) and achieving the necessary fire-resistance ratings for compartment walls can be complex. This is particularly true when services (electrical conduits, pipes) need to penetrate these fire-rated walls, as the penetrations must be properly fire-stopped to maintain the integrity of the fire barrier.¹⁴
• Lack of PEB Study Resources for PE Examinations: While not a direct challenge for an existing PE endorsing a wall, it is worth noting that candidates aspiring to become Professional Engineers (who would then be qualified to provide such endorsements) sometimes face difficulties in preparing for the PEB’s rigorous examinations due to the unavailability of official study notes or past papers from PEB.⁶ This highlights the demanding nature of the qualification process itself.

A critical underlying challenge is bridging the gap between theoretical design and practical installation quality. A PE can meticulously design and endorse a non-load bearing wall system that, on paper, meets all safety and performance standards. However, if the installation on site is substandard – due to poor workmanship, incorrect material usage (e.g., wrong grout mix), inadequate supervision, or deviation from the endorsed method statement – the as-built wall will likely not perform as intended.¹¹ It may fail to achieve the required fire rating, acoustic performance, or robustness under SS 492, potentially leading to defects, safety issues, or non-compliance. This highlights the indispensable importance of competent contractors and diligent site supervision, which are often outside the direct control of the design PE unless their scope of engagement specifically includes supervision. Ensuring that the “as-built” reality matches the “as-designed and endorsed” intent is a persistent challenge in the construction industry and vital for the integrity of the PE endorsement process.

VIII. Paving the Way for Success: Best Practices for Owners and Professionals

Successfully navigating the PE endorsement process for non-load bearing walls requires a proactive and collaborative approach from all stakeholders. Adopting best practices can significantly mitigate challenges, streamline approvals, and lead to safer, more compliant outcomes.

A. The Value of Early PE Engagement and Thorough Due Diligence

One of the most effective strategies for a smoother endorsement journey is to engage a Professional Engineer at the very outset of the project, ideally during the conceptual or preliminary design stage, even before detailed plans are drawn up.³

• Best Practice: Instead of viewing PE involvement as a late-stage requirement for stamping plans, property owners and architects should consult with a PE early on. This allows the PE to provide initial advice on the feasibility of the proposed works, help accurately identify wall types, clarify whether PE endorsement will be necessary, and highlight potential regulatory hurdles or complex technical issues that need to be addressed.
• Benefit: Early PE input can prevent abortive design work, where plans are developed only to be found non-compliant or structurally problematic later. It allows for the integration of safety and compliance requirements into the design from the beginning, rather than as costly afterthoughts or rectifications. This proactive approach can save considerable time, reduce overall project costs, and minimize the risk of significant changes being required by authorities during the formal submission process.

Many of the common challenges in PE endorsement, such as misidentification of wall types or a late realization of complex regulatory requirements, stem from insufficient upfront investigation and expert consultation. By front-loading the engineering expertise, potential problems can be anticipated and addressed proactively. This initial investment in PE consultation can de-risk the project significantly and set a clear path towards a successful and compliant outcome.

B. Fostering Effective Communication and Collaboration

Construction and renovation projects inherently involve multiple parties – the property owner, architect, Professional Engineer(s) for different disciplines (structural, mechanical, electrical, fire safety), main contractor, sub-contractors, and various suppliers. Effective communication and seamless collaboration among these stakeholders are paramount.⁵⁹

• Best Practice: Establish clear lines of communication and foster an environment of open dialogue from the project’s inception. Regular project meetings, whether virtual or in-person, should be held to discuss progress, address queries, resolve conflicts, and ensure all parties have a shared understanding of the project goals, design intent, regulatory constraints, and respective responsibilities. The use of collaborative digital platforms can also aid in information sharing and coordination.
• Benefit: Proactive and transparent communication reduces the likelihood of misunderstandings, misinterpretations of plans or requirements, and uncoordinated actions. It enables issues to be identified and resolved more quickly, minimizing delays and potential disputes. When all team members are aligned and working cohesively, the project is more likely to proceed smoothly and efficiently.

Construction projects are often characterized by their fragmented nature, with professionals from diverse backgrounds and disciplines sometimes working in relative isolation, making decisions that can impact one another without full awareness.⁶⁰ For instance, if an architect designs an aesthetically pleasing feature involving a non-load bearing wall without fully consulting the PE on its structural stability or fire compartmentation implications, or if a contractor makes unauthorized on-site changes to an endorsed design without informing the PE, significant problems can arise during construction or later during authority inspections. A collaborative approach, often facilitated by a designated lead QP or project manager, is essential to ensure that design considerations, compliance requirements, and constructability aspects are addressed holistically and in an integrated manner. This involves clear delineation of roles and responsibilities but also emphasizes integrated teamwork and mutual respect among all project participants.

C. Meticulous Planning and Documentation

The quality and completeness of documentation are critical for a successful PE endorsement and authority approval process.

• Best Practice: Invest adequate time and effort in the thorough preparation of all required plans (architectural, structural, M&E, fire safety), design calculations, technical specifications, method statements, and supporting documents.³ All documents must be accurate, clear, unambiguous, and fully compliant with the latest regulatory requirements and relevant codes of practice. Good record-keeping of all design decisions, revisions, communications with authorities, and site instructions is also essential.
• Benefit: Well-prepared and comprehensive documentation significantly speeds up the review process by authorities like BCA and SCDF. It reduces the likelihood of RFIs (Requests for Information), which are a common cause of delays. Clear documentation also minimizes the risk of misinterpretation by contractors during construction and provides a robust audit trail for future reference or in the event of any disputes.

The adage “garbage in, garbage out” is highly applicable to regulatory submissions. If the documentation submitted to authorities is incomplete, contains errors, lacks necessary information, or is non-compliant with prevailing codes, it will inevitably lead to queries, rejections, or protracted review cycles.³⁷ The quality of the input – the submission package – directly influences the timeliness and success of the output – the approvals. Professional Engineers and other QPs must therefore be meticulous in preparing and reviewing all submission documents. This rigorous attention to detail is a hallmark of professionalism and is vital for navigating the regulatory process efficiently and effectively.

D. Proactive Engagement with Authorities (Where Appropriate)

While the formal submission process is inherently evaluative, regulatory authorities like BCA and SCDF often provide avenues for pre-submission consultation or clarification, especially for projects that are complex, involve innovative solutions, or deal with areas where regulatory interpretation might be nuanced.

• Best Practice: For projects with unusual design features, those employing performance-based solutions (e.g., for fire safety), or where there is uncertainty about the interpretation or applicability of specific code provisions, QPs (including PEs) should consider proactively engaging with the relevant authorities for pre-submission consultation.³⁵ This might involve informal discussions, presenting preliminary concepts, or seeking written clarification on specific points.
• Benefit: Such early engagement can prevent wasted effort on developing detailed designs that may ultimately prove unacceptable to the authorities. It provides an opportunity to gain clarity on regulatory expectations, discuss the merits of proposed alternative solutions, and achieve early alignment with the authorities’ perspectives. This can lead to a more streamlined formal submission process and a higher likelihood of first-pass approval.

Leveraging these consultation opportunities can be a highly effective strategy for complex projects. It can transform what might be perceived as a potentially adversarial review process into a more collaborative one, where the shared goal is to achieve a safe, compliant, and well-engineered outcome. Viewing authorities not just as enforcers but also as sources of expert guidance (within the appropriate channels) can be beneficial for all parties.

IX. Future Outlook: Innovations and Evolving Standards in Non-Load Bearing Wall Systems

The design and construction of non-load bearing walls, like other aspects of the built environment, are subject to ongoing innovation and evolving standards. Staying abreast of these trends is important for industry professionals.

A. Trends in Non-Load Bearing Wall Systems and Materials

Several trends are shaping the future of non-load bearing wall systems in Singapore and globally:

• Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA): There is a significant push, supported by authorities like BCA, towards greater adoption of DfMA principles in construction.²⁹ For non-load bearing walls, this translates to increased use of prefabricated and modular wall systems. These systems are manufactured off-site in controlled factory environments and then transported to site for quick and precise assembly. Benefits include improved quality control, faster construction speed, reduced site wastage, and enhanced site safety.
• Sustainable Materials: Environmental considerations are increasingly influencing material choices. There is a growing demand for non-load bearing wall systems made from sustainable and eco-friendly materials, including those with high recycled content, low embodied carbon, and sourced from responsibly managed resources. Low Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emitting materials are also preferred to ensure better indoor air quality.¹⁶
• High-Performance Systems: Modern non-load bearing wall systems are being engineered to offer enhanced performance characteristics beyond basic space division. This includes systems with superior acoustic insulation (higher STC ratings), improved thermal performance (contributing to building energy efficiency), and higher fire-resistance ratings.¹⁸
• Smart Walls and Integrated Technology: The concept of “smart walls” is emerging, involving the integration of technology directly within wall systems. This could include embedded sensors, interactive displays, dynamic lighting, or integrated building automation controls. (Image: Modern Prefabricated Non-Load Bearing Wall Panel System)

The construction industry’s shift towards greater off-site fabrication and system-based solutions is evident. For non-load bearing walls, this means a gradual move from purely traditional site-built methods (like bricklaying or manual stud framing) towards the adoption of proprietary, engineered wall systems. These systems often come with comprehensive manufacturer-supplied test certifications for various performance aspects, including structural robustness (e.g., to SS 492), fire resistance, and acoustic insulation. This trend may streamline certain aspects of the design and PE endorsement process, as PEs can rely on these certifications, provided the systems are correctly specified, detailed for site conditions, and properly installed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and PE-endorsed plans. However, it also requires PEs to be knowledgeable about these new technologies, their material properties, jointing methods, and the specific compliance pathways for such systems in Singapore.

B. Anticipating Regulatory Shifts and Industry Developments

The regulatory and industry landscape for building works is not static; it evolves in response to new technologies, emerging safety concerns, research findings, and changing societal expectations.

• Continued Emphasis on Safety, Quality, and Resilience: Regulatory authorities like BCA and SCDF will continue to prioritize building safety and quality. Standards and codes are likely to be updated periodically to incorporate new knowledge, address lessons learned from incidents (locally or internationally), and enhance the resilience of buildings to various hazards. The 2024 amendments to the Building Control Regulations are a recent example of this evolution.⁹
• Digitalization and BIM: The construction industry is progressively embracing digitalization. The use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for design, coordination, and documentation is becoming more widespread. Regulatory submissions are also transitioning to more advanced digital platforms, such as BCA’s CORENET X initiative, which aims to streamline the approvals process.⁴³ PEs and other QPs will need to be proficient in these digital tools and workflows.
• Sustainability Focus: Singapore’s commitment to sustainability and its Green Plan objectives will likely lead to more stringent requirements for green building materials, construction waste management, and building energy efficiency. These requirements could influence the design and material selection for non-load bearing walls, for example, by promoting materials with lower embodied carbon or those contributing to better thermal insulation of the building envelope.

The regulatory landscape is dynamic, not fixed. Eurocodes and Singapore Standards, which form the technical basis for much of the design and compliance work, are subject to periodic review and revision to keep them aligned with international best practices and local needs.¹³ This dynamism necessitates that PEs and other industry professionals engage in continuous professional development (CPD), as mandated by PEB ⁵, to stay abreast of these changes. Relying on outdated knowledge of codes or regulations can lead to non-compliant designs and endorsements. What is considered acceptable and compliant today might require adjustment or a different approach tomorrow. This ongoing evolution of standards and practices requires constant vigilance from all stakeholders and reinforces the need for PEs to maintain current knowledge to provide accurate and reliable professional services. This is a continuous challenge and a hallmark of a responsible engineering profession.

X. Conclusion: Building with Confidence – The Enduring Importance of PE Endorsement

The journey of modifying or erecting non-load bearing walls in Singapore, while seemingly straightforward for some, is intricately woven into a robust regulatory framework designed to ensure the safety, quality, and integrity of the built environment. Professional Engineering endorsement stands as a critical pillar in this framework, providing the necessary assurance that such works are undertaken responsibly and in compliance with the nation’s high standards.

Key takeaways from this comprehensive exploration include:

• PE endorsement is fundamentally about safety and compliance. It is a formal verification by a licensed Professional Engineer that proposed building works, including those involving non-load bearing walls, meet all relevant legislative and technical requirements.
• Understanding the true nature of non-load bearing walls is crucial. While they do not support primary building loads, they perform vital functions related to space division, fire safety, acoustic separation, and service integration. Their modification is not to be taken lightly.
• A multi-agency regulatory landscape governs these works. BCA, PEB, SCDF, and often URA, HDB, or JTC, each play distinct but interconnected roles. Navigating their respective requirements demands expertise and careful coordination.
• Exemptions for “insignificant building works” exist but are conditional. The Building Control Regulations provide specific criteria for works on non-load bearing walls that may not require full plan submission, but these conditions must be strictly met. The 2024 amendments have further refined and expanded these exemptions.
• PE endorsement is mandatory in numerous scenarios, particularly for high walls, walls made of heavy materials, alterations impacting fire safety, and specific HDB/JTC works, or when required by MCSTs.
• The PE endorsement process is systematic, involving initial consultation, detailed design and documentation (plans, calculations), submissions to authorities via platforms like CORENET, and the PE’s formal stamp and certification.
• Compliance with Singapore Standards (like SS 492 for partition robustness) and Eurocodes (with their Singapore National Annexes for structural design, actions, and material properties) is essential. These standards provide the technical basis for safe and durable construction.
• Common challenges include misidentification of wall types, difficulties in navigating inter-agency requirements, the subjective nature of “immaterial” changes, ensuring on-site compliance with endorsed plans, managing costs, and dealing with unforeseen conditions in existing buildings.
• Best practices such as early PE engagement, fostering effective collaboration among all project stakeholders, meticulous planning and documentation, and proactive communication with authorities can significantly contribute to a smoother and more successful outcome.

Ultimately, while some minor works on non-load bearing walls may indeed be exempt from formal PE endorsement and extensive submissions, it is always prudent to err on the side of caution. If there is any doubt regarding the structural nature of a wall, the scope of proposed works, or the applicability of regulations, consulting a qualified Professional Engineer is the most responsible course of action.

The PE endorsement process should not be viewed merely as a bureaucratic hurdle or an avoidable expense. Instead, it is a valuable mechanism that safeguards the interests of property owners, occupants, and the public at large. It ensures that modifications to our buildings are undertaken with due regard for structural integrity, fire safety, and overall building performance. By engaging qualified PEs and adhering to the established regulatory framework, all stakeholders can contribute to building with confidence, creating spaces that are not only functional and aesthetically pleasing but also safe, resilient, and compliant for years to come.

XI. Glossary of Essential Terms

• AAC: Autoclaved Aerated Concrete
• AC: Accredited Checker
• A&A: Additions & Alterations
• BCA: Building and Construction Authority
• BP: Building Plan
• CORENET: Construction and Real Estate Network
• CPD: Continuing Professional Development
• DfMA: Design for Manufacturing and Assembly
• FC: Fire Certificate
• FEE: Fundamentals of Engineering Examination
• FER: Fire Safety Engineering Report
• FEDB: Fire Safety Engineering Design Brief
• FSE: Fire Safety Engineer
• FSSD: Fire Safety and Shelter Department (of SCDF)
• GFA: Gross Floor Area
• HDB: Housing & Development Board
• JTC: JTC Corporation
• MCST: Management Corporation Strata Title
• M&E: Mechanical and Electrical
• NA: National Annex (to Eurocodes)
• NLBW: Non-Load Bearing Wall
• PE: Professional Engineer
• PEB: Professional Engineers Board
• PPE: Practice of Professional Engineering Examination
• QP: Qualified Person (can be a PE or Registered Architect)
• RFI: Request for Information
• SCDF: Singapore Civil Defence Force
• SS: Singapore Standard
• ST: Structural Plan
• STC: Sound Transmission Class
• TOP: Temporary Occupation Permit
• URA: Urban Redevelopment Authority
• VOC: Volatile Organic Compound
• WP: Written Permission (from URA)

Works cited

1. Professional Engineer Singapore | BroadTech Engineering, accessed May 24, 2025, https://broadtechengineering.com/professional-engineer/
2. PE Professional Engineer Singapore – BroadTech Engineering, accessed May 24, 2025, https://broadtechengineering.com/pe-professional-engineer/
3. Professional Engineer Endorsement in Singapore – Pyromech SG, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.pyromech.sg/professional-engineer-services/
4. PE Endorsement Singapore | BroadTech Engineering, accessed May 24, 2025, https://broadtechengineering.com/pe-endorsement/
5. Professional Engineers And PEB, accessed May 24, 2025, https://afeo.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/PE-and-PEB-CAFEO-35-IES.pdf
6. PE Certification Singapore – BroadTech Engineering, accessed May 24, 2025, https://broadtechengineering.com/pe-certification/
7. Building Interior – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/public/private-property-ownership/renovation-maintenance-and-building-works-for-private-properties/building-works-that-do-not-require-plan-submission-to-bca/building-interior
8. What You Must Know Before Knocking Down That Bedroom Wall! | Singapore, accessed May 24, 2025, https://9reno.com/what-you-must-know-before-knocking-down-that-bedroom-wall/
9. bca.gov.sg, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-news-and-publications/circulars/circular-on-notification-of-changes-to-the-building-control-regulations-2003—building-control-(amendment-no-3)-regulations-2024.pdf
10. Building Control Act – Singapore Statutes Online, accessed May 24, 2025, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act-Rev/29/Published?DocDate=19991230&ProvIds=Sc-
11. Advisory on good practices of design and installation of high non-load bearing wall – corenet, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.corenet.gov.sg/media/2268642/advisory-on-good-practices-of-design-and-installation-of-high-non-load-bearing-wall.pdf
12. bca.gov.sg, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-news-and-publications/publications/for-industry/buildability-series/bswall.pdf
13. Code of practice for design and installation of partition walls – Singapore Standards, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.singaporestandardseshop.sg/Product/GetPdf?fileName=180521100645CP90-2001%282014%29%28plus%29Amd%201_Preview.pdf&pdtid=2015d62f-a260-4ccf-bbba-bc1e8429ad5a
14. Clause 3.3 Fire Resistance of Elements of Structure – SCDF, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.scdf.gov.sg/fire-safety-services-listing/fire-code-2023/table-of-content/chapter-3-structural-fire-precautions/clause-3.3-fire-resistance-of-elements-of-structure
15. Clause 3.15 Materials for Construction – SCDF, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.scdf.gov.sg/fire-safety-services-listing/fire-code-2023/table-of-content/chapter-3-structural-fire-precautions/clause-3.15-materials-for-construction
16. Acoustic Testing in Singapore: Standards for High-Quality Panels – Aural-Aid, accessed May 24, 2025, https://auralaid.com/acoustic-testing-in-singapore-standards-for-high-quality-panels/
17. Interior Wall Insulation | ROCKWOOL, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.rockwool.com/north-america/applications/interior-wall-insulation/
18. pdf – JOE Green Panel, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.joegreenpanel.com/en/downloads/joe-green-catalog/1684215627.pdf
19. bcaa.edu.sg, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.bcaa.edu.sg/docs/librariesprovider2/learning-journeys/lessons-learnt-from-structural-failure.pdf?sfvrsn=a8ce700c_0
20. UL Wall Assemblies, Fire Rated Wall Designs – USG, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.usg.com/content/usgcom/en/design-studio/wall-assemblies.html
21. Applying for Approval – HDB, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.hdb.gov.sg/residential/living-in-an-hdb-flat/renovation/applying-for-approval
22. Building and Construction Authority – Agency Details – Government Records, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/government_records/agency-details/62
23. Executive/Senior Engineer/Manager, Building Plan & Universal Design Department – Careers@Gov Singapore, accessed May 24, 2025, https://jobs.careers.gov.sg/jobs/hrp/14329231/9d4a6d22-d5c9-1edf-94a1-9d648ab6f332
24. SINGAPORE – Building and Construction Authority (BCA) & Ministry of Foreign Affairs, accessed May 24, 2025, https://globalabc.org/node/206
25. Building Control Act | Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/regulatory-info/building-control/building-control-act
26. Building Control Act (Chapter 29) – Climate Change Laws of the World, accessed May 24, 2025, https://climate-laws.org/document/building-control-act-chapter-29_9f90
27. Approved Document – BuiltSearch Code, accessed May 24, 2025, https://code.builtsearch.com/codes/approved-document
28. approved-document-v7-07.pdf – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-regulatory/approved-document-v7-07.pdf?sfvrsn=5be1dd75_1
29. Structural Steel | Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/productivity/design-for-manufacturing-and-assembly-dfma/structural-steel
30. gov.sg, accessed May 24, 2025, https://corenet.gov.sg/einfo/Uploads/Circular/CBCA140313.pdf
31. peb.gov.sg, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.peb.gov.sg/functions/#:~:text=The%20main%20functions%20of%20PEB,a%20register%20of%20licensed%20corporations.
32. Functions – Professional Engineers Board, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.peb.gov.sg/functions/
33. professional engineers board singapore, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.peb.gov.sg/downloads/registrationaspe.pdf
34. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS (CODE OF PROFESSIONAL …, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.peb.gov.sg/Html/pe_code.html
35. Performance-Based Plan Approval Process – Singapore – SCDF, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.scdf.gov.sg/fire-safety-services-listing/plans-submission-process/performance-based-approach-to-fire-safety-design/performance-based-plan-approval-process
36. Plan Approval – Singapore – SCDF, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.scdf.gov.sg/fire-safety-services-listing/plans-submission-process/plan-approval
37. Building Plan Submission | Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/regulatory-info/building-control/building-plan-submission
38. #1 Free Guide on Cost of Hacking Walls in Singapore, accessed May 24, 2025, https://hackingsingapore.com/blog/cost-of-hacking-walls-in-singapore/
39. jtc.gov.sg, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.jtc.gov.sg/-/media/project/jtc-cx/corpweb/space-submission-handbook-v6.pdf
40. Space Submission Handbook PCP-WI-09 Version 5.0, Updated 03.01.2022 1 – JTC, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.jtc.gov.sg/-/media/project/jtc-cx/corpweb/space-submission-handbook.pdf
41. Minor Addition & Alteration Works – Singapore – SCDF, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.scdf.gov.sg/fire-safety-services-listing/plans-submission-process/minor-addition-alterationworks
42. submission of amendment / record plan(s) for changes in building works that deviate from – corenet, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.corenet.gov.sg/media/2330685/submission-of-record-plans-for-deviations-from-approved-bp.pdf
43. Professional Engineers Board (PEB), accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.peb.gov.sg/
44. PE Endorsement Services in Singapore, accessed May 24, 2025, https://singaporehackers.com.sg/pe-endorsement/
45. Structural Plans and Permit Approvals – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/regulatory-info/building-control/structural-plans-and-permit-approvals
46. GUIDELINES ON STRUCTURAL SUBMISSIONS THROUGH ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION SYSTEM – corenet, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.corenet.gov.sg/einfo/Uploads/Circulars/CBCA030220.pdf
47. BCA Submission – PE Consultants – Construction, accessed May 24, 2025, https://qp.sg/bca-submission-services-pe-consultants-singapore-structural-plan-endorsement/
48. Revised Seal Design for Specialist Professional Engineers – Association of Consulting Engineers Singapore, accessed May 24, 2025, http://aces.org.sg/wp-content/pdf/2023/076_2023-PEB%20Circular%20-%20Revised%20Seal%20Design%20for%20Specialist%20Professional%20Engineers_13%20Mar%202023.pdf
49. BPD_BP09 – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-form/bp09.doc?sfvrsn=63012b09_2
50. Form BCD BPN C1 – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-form/csc06.doc?sfvrsn=173763a6_2
51. THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION AND, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-form/structural-plans-submission/bevtc.doc?sfvrsn=33a51fb7_2
52. NA To SS EN 1991-1-1-2008 | PDF | Bridge – Scribd, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/703694466/NA-to-SS-EN-1991-1-1-2008
53. EN 1991-1-1: Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-1: General actions – Densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.phd.eng.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/en.1991.1.1.2002.pdf
54. NA To SS EN 1991-1-7-2009 | PDF – Scribd, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/703694724/NA-to-SS-EN-1991-1-7-2009
55. Eurocode design factors and limits – newsteelconstruction.com, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.newsteelconstruction.com/wp/eurocode-design-factors-and-limits/
56. TABLE R301.7 ALLOWABLE DEFLECTION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERSb, c Rafters having slopes greater than 3:12 with no finished ceiling att, accessed May 24, 2025, https://iccsafe.org/wp-content/uploads/bcac/IRC_Table_R301-7_New_11-05-12pdc.pdf
57. Annex 3A – Singapore – SCDF, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.scdf.gov.sg/fire-safety-services-listing/fire-code-2023/table-of-content/chapter-3-structural-fire-precautions/annex-3a
58. Dry Internal Partition Walls for Quality Homes – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed May 24, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-news-and-publications/publications/for-industry/buildability-series/dry_wall_flyer.pdf
59. Design and Coordination Engineer (A1 main contractor) Architecture / Interior Design Jobs Singapore – MyCareersFuture, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.mycareersfuture.gov.sg/job/architecture/design-coordination-engineer-onion-search-cdd1d8c532fc46143c5569fec9bdb9e2
60. A Framework for Coordination Process into Construction Projects – ResearchGate, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305309827_A_Framework_for_Coordination_Process_into_Construction_Projects
61. Unveiling the Costs: Submission for A&A – TCA Design and Build, accessed May 24, 2025, https://tcadesignbuild.com/blog/f/unveiling-the-costs-submission-for-aa
62. [Full Breakdown] Cost Of Hacking Walls In Singapore | Hackstage Builders, accessed May 24, 2025, https://hackstagebuilders.com/blog/cost-of-hacking-walls-in-singapore/
63. The Hidden Costs of Hacking Wall: What Every Singaporean Homeowner Should Know About Renovation – 9Creation Interior Design, accessed May 24, 2025, https://9creation.com.sg/cost-of-hacking-wall-singapore/
64. Circular: Safe design and installation of outriggers or overhead supports for suspended scaffolds – MOM, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/-/media/mom/documents/safety-health/circulars/2025/circular-20250110-safe-design-and-installation-of-outriggers-or-overhead-supports.pdf
65. 20210811_Buildo-Watertight-ALC-Wall-Panel-System-Catalogue_Web.pdf – Buildo Engineering Pte Ltd, accessed May 24, 2025, https://buildo.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/20210811_Buildo-Watertight-ALC-Wall-Panel-System-Catalogue_Web.pdf
66. Eurocode 2 : Design of concrete structures – Singapore Standards, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.singaporestandardseshop.sg/Product/GetPdf?fileName=230331131621SS%20EN%201992-1-2-2008%282023%29%20incorp%20A1-2023%20Preview.pdf&pdtid=848964a1-b520-443c-853a-63f07e7bde30
67. Singapore National Annex to Eurocode 3 : Design of steel structures, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.singaporestandardseshop.sg/Product/GetPdf?fileName=231227153647NA%2BA1%20to%20SS%20EN%201993-1-5-2009%282023%29%20Preview.pdf&pdtid=3e321b06-ea29-4b32-91be-d812adc2cab6
68. Eurocode 2 : Design of concrete structures – Singapore Standards, accessed May 24, 2025, https://www.singaporestandardseshop.sg/Product/GetPdf?fileName=180331135725SS%20EN%201992-1-2-2008%20%282015%29_Preview.pdf&pdtid=848964a1-b520-443c-853a-63f07e7bde30
69. Nationally Determined Parameters | Eurocodes: Building the future – European Union, accessed May 24, 2025, https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en-eurocodes-implementation/nationally-determined-parameters